Might as well, I doubt Cassell will give us much better than about 200-250 yards per game and a 1:1 TD:INT ratio but there is no way he can possibly be worse than Weeden.
5 3 and out's in 6 drives?
Give me a break.
That was just ridiculous. Something had to change.
blows my mind we had the gall to roll with Weeden. He's beyond pathetic. Cassell has to be
markedly better.
blows my mind we had the gall to roll with Weeden. He's beyond pathetic. Cassell has to be
markedly better.
Weeden's a fine backup (you won't find much better out there on average), but multi-game starters need to have proven they can win. That's why I never got why teams paid big for Matt Flynn to be their day one starter.
Guys like Hasselbeck and Vick are out there winning key games.
If the offensive structure and playcalling is as demented as it has been under Weeden, not necessarily.
Uhhh, no. He's not a "fine" backup. If you can't count on him to run a dumbed down version of your offense, he's not even close to "fine". Unless of course you think missing wide open receivers and looking for the checkdown 95% of the time as "fine".
Weeden's a piece of shit. The definition of a fine backup has really fallen.
Oh, and Jason Garrett would certainly not be mistaken as a starting caliber QB. But he'd at least throw the fucking ball down field. Stupid comparison.