My point is it's not pathetic, which was the original statement.
Antonio Brown (considered by many to be top 5 in the league) only hits at 13 per catch. Damn close to pathetic.
Pathetic is not the word you want.
My point is it's not pathetic, which was the original statement.
And, 10 is sub elite TE range. Not standard TE range. So, let's not get silly.
Steelers might want to start bracketing Gronk in the red zone. Just a suggestion.
No, I don't think so. Elite TE range would be 12-13 I'd say. Witten has always been on the low end at 11.
10 is on the low end for starting TE's, I'd wager.
Edelman is a product of Brady and the offense. Which is fine but he isn't a talent anyone in the NFL fears.

Andre Johnson averaged 11 last year. F'ing pathetic.
Cole Beasley... obviously a pathetic year he had.
The difference between top 5 WR in the league and "pathetic" is 3 yards a catch.
Percy Harvin approaching pathetic territory with 12 yards per.
Good lord.
And yet none of them averaged 10. So, if you have one of the worst statistics of NFL WRs, how would you define that in any other way then pathetic.
You keep naming guys and numbers and all of them were still better. Doesn't that tell you something? Maybe you should claim hyperbole, or just use those 3 PBRs as your excuse.
I'm not saying Edelman is some elite WR. But, he damn sure has to be gameplanned for, and is not "pathetic", and to even suggest he is, is moronic.
No one said Edelman is a pathetic WR. Are you drunk or something? The only thing that was said was that 10 ypc is pathetic for a WR. Which it is, because it is near the league worst for WRs. It's like a RB who averages 3.2 ypc.
I named receivers (some elite) with numbers pretty comparable, and compared them to this "pathetic" receiver.