p1_
DCC 4Life
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2013
- Messages
- 27,424
Interesting.
Felix Jones. Jesus.
Seriously? Fuuuuuuckkkk.....
Interesting.
Felix Jones. Jesus.
I doubt it. It's probably more likely Jerry doing a favor for an old buddy and form Arkansas player. By working him out it kind of keeps his name on the radar for other teams. I wouldn't read much into this.
What's guaranteed?
Dunbar yes. Like I said, I really doubt he'll make the final roster. Williams, I can see making the final 53.Is that not what Dunbar and Williams are already?
Kidding, right?
Felix isn't a cheap camp body, neither is Tate. A UDFA is a cheap camp body.
So they work out Felix AND Tate, but they are only doing it for favors and stuff?
Oh, ok.
This is the same thing I said when Sanchez claimed Tebow was brought in to be a camp body.
These are not the type of players you bring in when you want camp bodies.
~crosses fingers for Tre Mason or Latavious Murray~Vinstile? I didn't realize you worked for MeUndies.
That is very interesting. I wonder what kind of RB they could get if they packaged him and Leary.
~crosses fingers for Tre Mason or Latavious Murray~
Lamar Miller is definitely my pet cat as far as potential trade targets go.
I like the player but I hate the fact that we'd be in the same situation again next offseason more then likely.
I like the player but I hate the fact that we'd be in the same situation again next offseason more then likely.
Lamar Miller is definitely my pet cat as far as potential trade targets go.

So even though it was very effective it must stop.
How does that make any sense.
Even in the most optimum conditions, I doubt even homers predicted that murray would break emmitt's single season rushing record.
I didn't predict Murray would break records but I did know he was an outstanding back and would have a .successful pro career. I have seen every game he played in college and was relying on my observations rather than aligning with draft pundits. I knew I had seen more of him than they had.
Its not the same when you claim it retroactively with benefit of hindsight. At the time, you typically claim that we don't know what will happen, that we will have to wait and see.
Its not the same when you claim it retroactively with benefit of hindsight. At the time, you typically claim that we don't know what will happen, that we will have to wait and see.
You are being facetious because I rarely say that. I hear it a lot from other posters but actually stating it is very occassional and not usual as you state. Claiming I don't know about something is simply an admission of the way I feel rather than making a prediction on something I don't care to predict or know about.
