The Outrage Thread

Also as a side note, this shows what happens when people think the conservative candidates aren't "right enough"... the Tories stayed home and basically let Labour win the last election, and now you see all the insanity they've brought in with even more mass immigration, jailing people for social media posts, and now this.
 
bbgun said:
If you're not explicitly anti-Trump, you're the enemy.
Click to expand...

It's mind blowing to some but Trump is probably a lot closer to your normal Liberal than Harris. So when you look at someone that generally leans slightly towards the Liberal side of things, I don't see why they wouldn't consider Trump.

Of course the problem is most don't actually pay attention to issues. It's like Cuban who basically disagrees with 90% of what Harris says she will do, ignores it, and is her superfan. Like when you say you disagree with her, but she won't really do that, how can you justify voting for her?
 
Cowboysrock55 said:
It's mind blowing to some but Trump is probably a lot closer to your normal Liberal than Harris. So when you look at someone that generally leans slightly towards the Liberal side of things, I don't see why they wouldn't consider Trump.

Of course the problem is most don't actually pay attention to issues. It's like Cuban who basically disagrees with 90% of what Harris says she will do, ignores it, and is her superfan. Like when you say you disagree with her, but she won't really do that, how can you justify voting for her?
Click to expand...
I saw someone saying yesterday, you know how Ben Shapiro says facts don't care about your feelings? Well for the left, feelings don't care about your facts.

So true. Who cares about actual fact? Your feels are all that matter.
 
Andrew Schultz had a venue cancel his special taping, presumably because he interviewed Trump.

 
Last edited:
More on the doc who did this.

I can't believe how evil this is. I don't believe in hell, but sometimes I wish I did.

 
Chocolate Lab said:
Click to expand...



"I do not want our work to be weaponized. It has to be exactly on point, clear and concise. And that takes time."


In other words, this isn't science. It's basically, "I'm drawing my conclusion first and I'm going to keep manipulating my studies until I get the results I want."

This piece of shit should be in jail and nowhere near children.

By the way if anyone didn't read it, this study happened in 2015.

Also by the way, if you read this and don't also believe that this sort of manipulation happens in other fields (like climate "science"), you're kidding yourself.
 
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom