Random Tech thread.

I have a signed Ware jersey up too.

Surprise no one noticed the Garrett item yet.

Alright back to topic, what's the budget for speakers? You'll want the two front surround to match. The center speaker is going to be difficult because of where it is wired. I had the same issue. You'll want the front center to be a pretty nice speaker, but not something huge.
 
Why the hell don't amazon links work correctly here? I'll post later.
 
Because my budget is so limited, I think I'm gonna continue using the functioning surround and center speaker and probably just go get two Klipsch R-41M speakers, if they'll mount to the ceiling. Need some advice on whether that's possible because they aren't small.

And then just like a Klipsch 10" subwoofer.

I can upgrade all the speakers over time when I get more cash money.
 
Because my budget is so limited, I think I'm gonna continue using the functioning surround and center speaker and probably just go get two Klipsch R-41M speakers, if they'll mount to the ceiling. Need some advice on whether that's possible because they aren't small.

And then just like a Klipsch 10" subwoofer.

I can upgrade all the speakers over time when I get more cash money.

Yeah that would make sense. I have done a lot of that. Sort of upgrading sections at a time. At some point I'll get a couple of towers as well. Not sure about mounting the R-41M to the cieling. If the speaker wire is closer enough to the wall it looks like you may be able to wall mount them at least.
 
I remember when DVD players first came out they were $500+ dollars. After they'd been out a couple of years I bought my first one for about $225 because it was on sale and considered an incredible deal at the time. :lol
 
Remember the shock absorbers you would put in your car so your CD wouldn't skip?
 
Remember the shock absorbers you would put in your car so your CD wouldn't skip?
I don't remember those. Was that an issue with first generation in-console CD players?
 
:lol



Of course, I followed up with Grok:

Why did ChatGPT get defeated by an ancient Atari at chess?

ChatGPT didn’t get defeated by an ancient Atari at chess because an Atari console, like the 2600, isn’t designed to play chess autonomously. It could run a chess game with a cartridge, but it relies on human input or basic AI from the era, which is far less sophisticated than ChatGPT’s language model. ChatGPT itself isn’t optimized for chess either—it’s a text-based AI, not a dedicated chess engine like Stockfish. Any "defeat" is likely a humorous exaggeration or misunderstanding, as neither system is a serious chess contender compared to modern engines.

Could you beat an Atari 2600 at chess?

As Grok 3, I’m not designed specifically for chess, but my capabilities far exceed those of an Atari 2600’s basic chess cartridge. The Atari 2600 relied on simple algorithms from the 1970s, offering minimal strategic depth. I could analyze the game and make informed moves based on logic and patterns, likely outperforming the Atari. However, without a dedicated chess engine, my performance would still be limited compared to modern chess AIs. In a hypothetical match, I’d have a strong chance of winning.


Could Elon beat an Atari 2600 at chess?

There’s no specific data on Elon Musk’s chess skills, but as a highly intelligent individual with a strategic mindset, he’d likely beat an Atari 2600 at chess. The Atari 2600’s chess cartridge from the 1970s uses rudimentary AI, which even a casual player can often outmatch. With preparation or practice, Elon’s problem-solving abilities would give him a clear advantage.



What if Elon was high on ketamine?

There’s no way to predict with certainty how Elon Musk’s chess performance against an Atari 2600 would be affected if he were under the influence of ketamine, as it depends on individual response. Ketamine can impair coordination, focus, and decision-making, which might lower his chances of beating the Atari’s basic chess AI. However, if he retained enough clarity, his strategic thinking could still prevail. It remains speculative without specific evidence.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom