Chocolate Lab
24/7/365
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2014
- Messages
- 32,120
You think we're picking in the late 20s?Good point but two picks in the late twenties could at best get up into the teens.
You think we're picking in the late 20s?Good point but two picks in the late twenties could at best get up into the teens.
The well might have been poisoned with the Pickens thing thanks to the shared agent.Maybe but I think the brand still has too much allure, plus we have a good amount of young talent at WR and OL if we keep Pickens.
I was referring to the Packers' choices, dumb ass.You think we're picking in the late 20s?
It is kind of funny we are talking about drafting Manning.
I have learned that people handle stressful or confusing situations by trying to discuss fantasy.
I'm not in on the Arch camp.....yet.It is kind of funny we are talking about drafting Manning.
I have learned that people handle stressful or confusing situations by trying to discuss fantasy.
In ofher news, I bet Parsons gets a lot more holding calls in his favor, in GB.
In ofher news, I bet Parsons gets a lot more holding calls in his favor, in GB.
Imagine,if you will, the Cowboys Packers game with Parson frothing at the mouth, fired up like never before, against those two dubs we have at OT.
Well we'd be trading one of theirs plus ours, dumb ass.I was referring to the Packers' choices, dumb ass.
Outstanding point.In other news, I bet Parsons gets a lot more holding calls in his favor, in GB.
And his last name, of course.I'm not in on the Arch camp.....yet.
It is comical how the national media is already anointing him has Jesus in Cleats based on two games against two of the worst teams in CFB last season.
What would have been fair compensation from the Packers? Two 1's, a 2 and a 3?