Iran nuclear deal framework announced

Jiggyfly said:
Did you or did you not say we could destroy there capabilities without invading?

If so please show your grasp of how this can be done.
Click to expand...

Google " what capabilities does the united states military have to destroy underground facilities".
 
Last edited:
Our best bunker buster, MOP, can penetrate up to 200 ft.

I'm sure they have facilities deeper than that.
 
Clay_Allison said:
So how do you think we could destroy their capabilities without bombing or invasion?
Click to expand...

We can according to the Pentegon, destroy their capabality with bombs but I didn't make that statement. In fact I didnt state any scenario. Thats what the ruse with Jiggy was all about. He pronounced my position as invalid before I ever said how. I actually said the US could destroy their capability without invading or relinquishing a blockade. From that he said I didnt have a grasp of the situation. The rest was dialogue about him jumping the gun on his pronounced assessement of my non statement.
 
L.T. Fan said:
We can according to the Pentegon, destroy their capabality with bombs but I didn't make that statement. In fact I didnt state any scenario. Thats what the ruse with Jiggy was all about. He pronounced my position as invalid before I ever said how. I actually said the US could destroy their capability without invading or relinquishing a blockade. From that he said I didnt have a grasp of the situation. The rest was dialogue about him jumping the gun on his pronounced assessement of my non statement.
Click to expand...

So you accused Jiggy of misrepresenting what you meant by interpreting your statement as meaning bombing, when that's exactly what you meant?
 
Clay_Allison said:
So you accused Jiggy of misrepresenting what you meant by interpreting your statement as meaning bombing, when that's exactly what you meant?
Click to expand...

What i accused Jiggy of is jumping to a conclussion and judging a statement before i said anything. I really doesnt matter what i may have meant or intended to say, its not right to assess a judgement on a presumption. Had I stated that the bunkers could have been bombed according to the Pentegon , he still would have made the same assessment that I had no grasp of the situation evidenced by his reply that the nukes were below ground and apparently were not penetrable. All that was concluded by him even without me making any comment at all.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom