- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 142,849
We gave up a 2nd.
![]()
Savor the flavor.
We gave up a 2nd.
![]()
What is a reasonable price when you only have six picks?
I had an issue with Claiborne costing us a third last year. I'd have an even bigger issue giving that up in this draft.
True.
Yeah, if Warmack, Cooper, and Richardson are gone, this could be a great time to move back and focus on getting an extra pick or two and landing Pugh and Long or something like that.
Pugh and Terron Armstead then.![]()
I don't agree.You just don't move up for Gs.
I don't agree.
If a player is a difference maker and you want him, go get him. Guards aren't supposed to be top 10 picks either and they might be this year.
As much as I like Warmack I am not giving up a pick to go and get him. This team needs more than a G to get better, we need more picks, not less.
I don't think this Sully guy knows what the hell he's talking about. This is not a draft you want to move up in for the most part.
Our needs don't align with that type of move.
If you think we stay at 18 and go BPA, fine. But I fail to see how anyone can logically suggest we want to trade up.

As much as I like Warmack I am not giving up a pick to go and get him. This team needs more than a G to get better, we need more picks, not less.
I value the position, but a difference maker to me is a QB, WR, DE, DT type to me.
If you had a shot at the next Larry Allen or Will Shields, wouldn't you trade an extra 3rd round pick? That's all it might take in a deep draft like this.
Deep draft. You said so yourself. More picks in a deep draft are way better than less.
Agree normally, but the exception is when special players can be had. Besides, everyone knows it's a deep draft so they're holding onto their picks. No one is going to trade up short of a very specific player falling.
Atlanta has already made it public knowledge they are looking to move up.