Cowboys Nostalgia Thread

I'm not crying. You're crying.

Watching the 1995 NFCC 4th qtr vs Packers. This is making me cry.

38-27, 5 min left and Cowboys just getting first down after first, seeing Packers faces in a hard-fought game degenerate from focus to realization.
 
Watching the old games, noticed defense would do the Tush Push on the FG/XPs and NFL eventually outlawed it.

Wonder if today a LBer could push a NT into Jason Kelce.
 
While Aikman was SB 27 MVP, the 1995 Packers NFCC is notable because it’s the only playoff game Aikman won when defense allowed <21 points with Packers at 27. Only turnover was Larry Brown’s INT.

21/33 (63%), 255 yards, 2TD, 0 INT
107.5 QB Rating, 8.9 AY/A
 
Last edited:
His full name is Wilford Daniel White

Don’t think I can take for serious a QB named Willie White :lol

Even better, his dad, also named Wilford, had the nickname Whizzer

“Whizzer back to pass…”
 
Last edited:
Super Bowl 30 was also Jay Novacek's final game. As you know, we never regained our dominance since.

While many reasons Cowboys never reclaimed dominance after SB 30 (ie rise of GM Jerruh, free agency, injuries/suspension, et al), I wanted to see if possible to statistically show what our offense lost post-Novacek.

Advanced Splits only goes back to 1994, but here are the regular season 3rd down stats for Aikman-to-Novacek and Aikman-to-post Novacek (ie Bjornson & LaFleur). The next line is % of Aikman's 3rd down passes that went to TEs. Aikman's Actual Total 3rd Down stats (includes WR, TE, RB) are in parentheses.

Stats implicate that, on third down, Aikman targeted TE about ~46% less after Novacek. For actual first downs thrown by Aikman, ~64% less of them went to the TE. When Aikman did target TEs, Success Rate (defined by getting 1st down) dropped from 61% to 42%.

Ultimately, post-Novacek, TE targets dropped in half and was significantly less successful even when targeted. Most significant to W-L, though, is that Aikman's 3rd down overall success rate dropped from 47% to 41% which seems to be likely attributed to Novacek's retirement.

YearPlayerTargetsCompletions1st DownsSuccess Rate
1994***Novacek25171664%
1994***% of Aikman23% (109)25% (67)31% (51)47%
1995Novacek24161458%
1995% of Aikman21% (116)23% (69)25% (55)47%
1996***Bjornson21150%
1996***% of Aikman1% (149)1% (86)2% (61)41%
1997Bjornson/LaFleur2315939%
1997% of Aikman15% (154)17% (88)15% (64)42%
1998***Bjornson/LaFleur137644%
1998***% of Aikman10% (133)9% (79)11% (52)39%
*** Stats extrapolated for 16 games. Aikman played 1994 (14 games), 1996 (15 games), 1998 (11 games), which probably inflates the TE's a little since they didn't miss many games.
 
Last edited:
Super Bowl 30 was also Jay Novacek's final game. As you know, we never regained our dominance since.

While many reasons Cowboys never reclaimed dominance after SB 30 (ie rise of GM Jerruh, free agency, injuries/suspension, et al), I wanted to see if possible to statistically show what our offense lost post-Novacek.

Advanced Splits only goes back to 1994, but here are the regular season 3rd down stats for Aikman-to-Novacek and Aikman-to-post Novacek (ie Bjornson & LaFleur). The next line is % of Aikman's 3rd down passes that went to TEs. Aikman's Actual Total 3rd Down stats (includes WR, TE, RB) are in parentheses.

Stats implicate that, on third down, Aikman targeted TE about ~46% less after Novacek. For actual first downs thrown by Aikman, ~64% less of them went to the TE. When Aikman did target TEs, Success Rate (defined by getting 1st down) dropped from 61% to 42%.

Ultimately, post-Novacek, TE targets dropped in half and was significantly less successful even when targeted. Most significant to W-L, though, is that Aikman's 3rd down overall success rate dropped from 47% to 41% which seems to be likely attributed to Novacek's retirement.

YearPlayerTargetsCompletions1st DownsSuccess Rate
1994***Novacek25171664%
1994***% of Aikman23% (109)25% (67)31% (51)47%
1995Novacek24161458%
1995% of Aikman21% (116)23% (69)25% (55)47%
1996***Bjornson21150%
1996***% of Aikman1% (149)1% (86)2% (61)41%
1997Bjornson/LaFleur2315939%
1997% of Aikman15% (154)17% (88)15% (64)42%
1998***Bjornson/LaFleur137644%
1998***% of Aikman10% (133)9% (79)11% (52)39%
*** Stats extrapolated for 16 games. Aikman played 1994 (14 games), 1996 (15 games), 1998 (11 games), which probably inflates the TE's a little since they didn't miss many games.

NOTE: With less targets going to TE after Novacek departed, yet Aikman's 3rd down passes increasing, I took a quick look at Irvin's 3rd down stats to see if Aikman depended more on Irvin. Surprisingly, Aikman-to-Irvin % drop significantly in 1996-1998 in targets and success rate. 1994-1995, Irvin averaged 34% targets and 43% Success Rate. Afterwards, 1996-98 drops to 29% and 30%.

Who was Aikman throwing to 3rd down?
 
Last edited:
Watching the 1995 NFCC 4th qtr vs Packers. This is making me cry.

38-27, 5 min left and Cowboys just getting first down after first, seeing Packers faces in a hard-fought game degenerate from focus to realization.
While Aikman was SB 27 MVP, the 1995 Packers NFCC is notable because it’s the only playoff game Aikman won when defense allowed <21 points with Packers at 27. Only turnover was Larry Brown’s INT.

21/33 (63%), 255 yards, 2TD, 0 INT
107.5 QB Rating, 8.9 AY/A

SI posted a picture of Emmitt Smith after that game warning Pittsburgh about the “Emmitt Zone”, despite Aikman’s super efficient day.
 
NOTE: With less targets going to TE after Novacek departed, yet Aikman's 3rd down passes increasing, I took a quick look at Irvin's 3rd down stats to see if Aikman depended more on Irvin. Surprisingly, Aikman-to-Irvin % drop significantly in 1996-1998 in targets and success rate. 1994-1995, Irvin averaged 34% targets and 43% Success Rate. Afterwards, 1996-98 drops to 29% and 30%.

Who was Aikman throwing to 3rd down?
Don't want to put you to more work, but I wonder the breakdown between 96 and 97-8 when Gailey famously made Irvin less of the offense.
 
His full name is Wilford Daniel White

Don’t think I can take for serious a QB named Willie White :lol

Even better, his dad, also named Wilford, had the nickname Whizzer

“Whizzer back to pass…”


uncle-buck-blasphemy.gif
 
Super Bowl 30 was also Jay Novacek's final game. As you know, we never regained our dominance since.

While many reasons Cowboys never reclaimed dominance after SB 30 (ie rise of GM Jerruh, free agency, injuries/suspension, et al), I wanted to see if possible to statistically show what our offense lost post-Novacek.

Advanced Splits only goes back to 1994, but here are the regular season 3rd down stats for Aikman-to-Novacek and Aikman-to-post Novacek (ie Bjornson & LaFleur). The next line is % of Aikman's 3rd down passes that went to TEs. Aikman's Actual Total 3rd Down stats (includes WR, TE, RB) are in parentheses.

Stats implicate that, on third down, Aikman targeted TE about ~46% less after Novacek. For actual first downs thrown by Aikman, ~64% less of them went to the TE. When Aikman did target TEs, Success Rate (defined by getting 1st down) dropped from 61% to 42%.

Ultimately, post-Novacek, TE targets dropped in half and was significantly less successful even when targeted. Most significant to W-L, though, is that Aikman's 3rd down overall success rate dropped from 47% to 41% which seems to be likely attributed to Novacek's retirement.

YearPlayerTargetsCompletions1st DownsSuccess Rate
1994***Novacek25171664%
1994***% of Aikman23% (109)25% (67)31% (51)47%
1995Novacek24161458%
1995% of Aikman21% (116)23% (69)25% (55)47%
1996***Bjornson21150%
1996***% of Aikman1% (149)1% (86)2% (61)41%
1997Bjornson/LaFleur2315939%
1997% of Aikman15% (154)17% (88)15% (64)42%
1998***Bjornson/LaFleur137644%
1998***% of Aikman10% (133)9% (79)11% (52)39%
*** Stats extrapolated for 16 games. Aikman played 1994 (14 games), 1996 (15 games), 1998 (11 games), which probably inflates the TE's a little since they didn't miss many games.


In retrospect, I can't believe how hard it was for us to find a freaking competent TE after he left. It's really not that hard.
 
Don't want to put you to more work, but I wonder the breakdown between 96 and 97-8 when Gailey famously made Irvin less of the offense.

NOTE: 1996 stats are tough because Irvin missed 5 games. These numbers are extrapolated as if Irvin played 16 games, increasing actual numbers by 45% (=16 games / 11 games played).

YEARPLAYERTARGETSCOMPLETIONS1ST DOWNSUCCESS RATE5
1994+Irvin42272457%
1994+% of Aikman39% (109)41% (67)47% (51)47%
1995Irvin40262563%
1995% of Aikman34% (116)38% (69)45% (55)47%
1996*** +Irvin33141238%
1996*** +% of Aikman22% (149)16% (86)20% (61)41%
1997Irvin41252254%
1997% of Aikman27% (154)28% (88)34% (64)42%
1998+Irvin41221434%
1998+% of Aikman31% (92)28% (54)27% (36)39%
+ Aikman's stats extrapolated for 16 games. Aikman played 1994 (14 games), 1996 (15 games), 1998 (11 games). Irvin's stats increased only in 1994 and 1996.
 
NOTE: 1996 stats are tough because Irvin missed 5 games. These numbers are extrapolated as if Irvin played 16 games, increasing actual numbers by 45% (=16 games / 11 games played).

YEARPLAYERTARGETSCOMPLETIONS1ST DOWNSUCCESS RATE5
1994+Irvin42272457%
1994+% of Aikman39% (109)41% (67)47% (51)47%
1995Irvin40262563%
1995% of Aikman34% (116)38% (69)45% (55)47%
1996*** +Irvin33141238%
1996*** +% of Aikman22% (149)16% (86)20% (61)41%
1997Irvin41252254%
1997% of Aikman27% (154)28% (88)34% (64)42%
1998+Irvin41221434%
1998+% of Aikman31% (92)28% (54)27% (36)39%
+ Aikman's stats extrapolated for 16 games. Aikman played 1994 (14 games), 1996 (15 games), 1998 (11 games). Irvin's stats increased only in 1994 and 1996.
Yep, you Asian.
 
1:38 left, Shante Carver just sacked Favre and they just showed Brett’s father putting away the binoculars.
Carver actually had sacks?

Man, I bet Jimmy just set back and laughed at our drafting after he left.
 
Back
Top Bottom