Cowboys at Eagles | Week 7 Game Day Chatter Thread | 10/20/2013

[Texas Ace]

Will that stand???

I don't see the ball hit the ground, and more importantly, you cannot clearly see the ball hit the ground which means they can't overturn it.

 

[Smitty]

That should stand.

If it doesn't, the refs just don't even give a shit about objectivity.

 

[lostxn]

Wilcox lost in coverage but an athletic play otherwise

 

[boozeman]

Wow, that is like the Witten heel INT.

 

[22cowboysfan22]

Not sure what just happened, but to remain consistent I'm going to say 1. Wilcox as usually was 2 steps behind and 2. Should have never brought the ball out of the end zone.

Stupid players make stupid plays.

That wasn't even Wilcox man, Avant beat Carr on the route. But yeah, running the ball out of the endzone was dumb.

 

[Smitty]

They are gonna overturn it.

Fuckers.

They are just looking for a way to fuck us.

 

[Cowboysrock55]

Wilcox lost in coverage but an athletic play otherwise

The corner was burned on that as well.

 

[boozeman]

My God.

 

[Texas Ace]

There is no way you can overturn that because you cannot clearly see the ball hit the ground.

 

[Smitty]

There is no way that is conclusive evidence.

 

[Cotton]

That should stand.

 

[lostxn]

pick period no question

 

[22cowboysfan22]

No way they can overturn that, nowhere near conclusive evidence.

 

[1bigfan13]

The NFL takes twice as long for their replays as the NCAA.

If this were college the refs would have ruled on this 2 minutes ago.

 

[Tony D]

If Avant brings that in it's a TD. They would've never overturned that. That's an interception.

 

[boozeman]

A prayer session for this?

Really?

 

[Cotton]

Mike Pereira with riveting analysis.

 

[Smitty]

Cheaters.

Not even close to objective.

 

[BipolarFuk]

We would never get that motherfucking call in 1000 years.

 

[Texas Ace]

Fucking bullshit.

That is not conclusive evidence at all.