- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 25,274
Because Murray left?
Well RB is one reason and a pretty big one, imo.
Because Murray left?
Well RB is one reason and a pretty big one, imo.
What is another? RB was the low hanging fruit.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...sue-nfl-if-suspension-reduced-by-2-to-4-games
Cole (video link) hears from sources close to Hardy that the Cowboys defensive end is losing his will to fight the NFL in regard to his 10-game suspension, having been worn down by a long legal process. If Hardy’s appeal results in his ban being reduced by two or four games, he may be willing to accept the penalty rather than continuing to fight the NFL by filing a lawsuit against the league.
I don't believe that for one damn second. He is on a per game pay contract. No way he just gives up hundreds of thousands of dollars because he is "tired" of fighting the suspension. It's not like he is having to do shit anyway in regards to it. Dumb report.
I don't believe that for one damn second. He is on a per game pay contract. No way he just gives up hundreds of thousands of dollars because he is "tired" of fighting the suspension. It's not like he is having to do shit anyway in regards to it. Dumb report.
I don't believe that for one damn second. He is on a per game pay contract. No way he just gives up hundreds of thousands of dollars because he is "tired" of fighting the suspension. It's not like he is having to do shit anyway in regards to it. Dumb report.
I don't believe that for one damn second. He is on a per game pay contract. No way he just gives up hundreds of thousands of dollars because he is "tired" of fighting the suspension. It's not like he is having to do shit anyway in regards to it. Dumb report.
It depends on how the whole process works out though. If he believes he has a slim shot at getting it reduced by more than 2-4 games, he might just take the deal to get on the field sooner. Your point about being paid per game is important. If he feels the better shot at getting extra game checks is to comply with the reduction, why be stubborn? The court system is not going to necessarily be swift about giving him a decision, much less one in his favor. I don't know if he could obtain an injunction to play while it is being settled, that alone might be the bigger factor.
I'm not buying it. I think he does everything he possibly can to get the biggest reduction he can. And if his agent and lawyer are worth their salt they will advise him the same. There has been a precedent set. Let the courts follow it.
God, I'd file a suit against them for their delay, this is a sham.
Shrimp Beasley. Amirite, [MENTION=3]boozeman[/MENTION]?