Archive - Random Cowboys Related Stuff Thread...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Iamtdg said:


So, two things. Dez took 3 steps. I don't know how in the world that wouldn't be considered being established as a runner. And, two, Does landing on two feet establish one as a runner? What will constitute a runner? It's a stupid change that did absolutely nothing but placate the masses.
Click to expand...

This actually sounds worse :picard
 
jsmith6919 said:
This actually sounds worse :picard
Click to expand...

Yep, because what constitutes this establishment as a runner? 2 steps, 3 steps, tucking the ball, shoulders square?
 
Iamtdg said:
Yep, because what constitutes this establishment as a runner? 2 steps, 3 steps, tucking the ball, shoulders square?
Click to expand...

Yep, this will not end well. I just hope it's some other team that has their game stolen because of a ref's interpretation of the rule next time.
 
What the hell is wrong with this league when you can't call a play that's so clearly visible on fucking film? Jesus...
 
 
Excellent.
 
Iamtdg said:
Excellent.
Click to expand...

Don't get your hopes up.

The real insider has spoken...

 
The Cowboys are playing this correctly.

Remember, this is a guy who retired not that long ago, so on top of being a bit loony, the guy's passion fur the have has to be questioned as well.

How he carries himself through this process will tell the team a lot about his desire to keep playing and where his heart is.

I'll take crazy, but I don't want to count on a guy who won't give you everything he's got, and that's definitely a concern with this guy.
 
jsmith6919 said:
Yep, this will not end well. I just hope it's some other team that has their game stolen because of a ref's interpretation of the rule next time.
Click to expand...

If it had been Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers, or Manning throwing to any of their respective WRs, the rule would have changed.
 
So if a guy catches the ball with 2 feet in bounds as he is falling out of bounds is that not a catch now?
 
dallen said:
So if a guy catches the ball with 2 feet in bounds as he is falling out of bounds is that not a catch now?
Click to expand...

Yeah, as long as he maintains possession while going to the ground. That part of the rule makes sense. I mean, you want the receiver to have to maintain possession through the act of the catch, but the part that makes no sense is what constitutes a football move/being established as a runner nonsense.
 
Iamtdg said:
Yeah, as long as he maintains possession while going to the ground. That part of the rule makes sense. I mean, you want the receiver to have to maintain possession through the act of the catch, but the part that makes no sense is what constitutes a football move/being established as a runner nonsense.
Click to expand...

Taking steps with the ball or reaching for the goal line are not "acts common to the game" apparently. :dunce
 
Clay_Allison said:
Taking steps with the ball or reaching for the goal line are not "acts common to the game" apparently. :dunce
Click to expand...

They are a pack of fucking douchebags. No way, no how where they going to make that catch legal after Periella douched all over himself on national TV.
 


Welcome to Dallas, Kevin.
 
Iamtdg said:


Welcome to Dallas, Kevin.
Click to expand...

Good to see that you are coming around
 
@FieldYates: From @toddarcher & me: free agent LB Rolando McClain is visiting the Patriots today.
 
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom