Abortion... yeah or nah?

1bigfan13 said:
According to the Indianapolis Star article that I read, she sad she received a call from a colleague in Ohio after RvW was reversed. It reads as though the girl was already past 6 weeks pregnant when the doctor was first notified about the issue. The blurb is copied below.
Click to expand...
There is a rape exception tho
 
boozeman said:
Click to expand...

As usual, a lot of posturing about nothing.

Apparently all the Indianapolis Star journalist did was a simple public records request. Something the AG could've done before hopping in front of cameras.

 
1bigfan13 said:
As usual, a lot of posturing about nothing.

Apparently all the Indianapolis Star journalist did was a simple public records request. Something the AG could've done before hopping in front of cameras.

Click to expand...

That's not the issue, she disclosed the abortion but not the rape and she has a history of doing it




 
1bigfan13 said:
As usual, a lot of posturing about nothing.

Apparently all the Indianapolis Star journalist did was a simple public records request. Something the AG could've done before hopping in front of cameras.

Click to expand...

Like jsmith said, it isn't about reporting the abortion. It's about not reporting the rape and then somehow creating the lie that she couldn't have an abortion in Ohio. It's all theater.
 
So even if the Ohio police already knew about the rape she still had to report it in Indiana?

I've read that the family reported the rape around Jun 22. Seems unnecessary to have to double tap LE about the same case.
 
1bigfan13 said:
So even if the Ohio police already knew about the rape she still had to report it in Indiana?

I've read that the family reported the rape around Jun 22. Seems unnecessary to have to double tap LE about the same case.
Click to expand...
The Dr is required to report it
 
1bigfan13 said:
So even if the Ohio police already knew about the rape she still had to report it in Indiana?

I've read that the family reported the rape around Jun 22. Seems unnecessary to have to double tap LE about the same case.
Click to expand...
She was the original attending physician, so yeah.
 
Iamtdg said:
She was the original attending physician, so yeah.
Click to expand...
And again, she has a history of not doing it which is why she is probably about to lose her license
 
I’ll never understand why people have sex with kids.

They aren’t even attractive.
 


:lol
 


Lunatics.
 
1bigfan13 said:
Saying that all media isn't credible just because of a handful of bad apples seems odd. When a few cops go rogue and are in the news for the wrong reasons, don't you guys chastise people who label all cops bad?

In the case of the story with the 10 year old rape victim, I'm going to believe the media over Twitter Boy's because the media's story has proven to be factual.....the rapist was arrested and dragged in front of a judge. Unless you believe that whole arrest & courtroom thing to be a fabricated lib production with hired actors.

All this Twitter user has is some random conspiracy theory that he probably ran across while browsing some sketchy far-right message forum.
Click to expand...

To be fair, there is far more evidence that the majority of the media is lies/propaganda than there is that the majority of cops are evil.
 
Iamtdg said:
I do not agree with a national ban. Even as much as I abhor abortions, it should be left up to the states.
Click to expand...
I also have no issue with it. Just don’t get the flip flop from Graham.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom