2025 Draft Big Boards, Position Rankings, and Mocks

Status
Not open for further replies.
1737837460870.png


My choice was basically between the two OTs and Green as far as I would have like to draft. Like Williams and hope we have a shot at him. I think I would rather have Judkins of the two OSU RBs but I didnt really watch a lot of OSU games.
 
Rev said:
View attachment 695988


My choice was basically between the two OTs and Green as far as I would have like to draft. Like Williams and hope we have a shot at him. I think I would rather have Judkins of the two OSU RBs but I didnt really watch a lot of OSU games.
Click to expand...
Henderson is faster, Judkins may be quicker and is stronger. About 10 pounds heavier too.
 
  • Props
Reactions: Rev
shoop said:
Henderson is faster, Judkins may be quicker and is stronger. About 10 pounds heavier too.
Click to expand...

Judkins is the thunder and Henderson is the lightening. I like Judkins more but they are both great.

Green feels like a reach but I don't know who is left.
 
Cowboysrock55 said:
Judkins is the thunder and Henderson is the lightening. I like Judkins more but they are both great.

Green feels like a reach but I don't know who is left.
Click to expand...

The usual suspects plus the two tackles. No Jalen Walker. No Jeanty No Arizona WR.
 
boozeman said:


He goes the lazy route with Jeanty.
Click to expand...


He's the obvious pick if he's there although I found it interesting that he had Warren in the top 10.

If Jeanty and McMillan are gone I think I might go Warren, especially now that I don't really give much of a fuck about immediate year 1 impact with this dumbass HC hire they just made.

Jalon Walker, Pearce and Harmon are all still strong considerations for me too. You'd have to consider Banks if he's there too but I'd rather go elsewhere.
 
Simpleton said:
He's the obvious pick if he's there although I found it interesting that he had Warren in the top 10.
Click to expand...
You know these things are cyclical. Warren is everyone’s non-balding Brock Bowers not the white version of Kyle Pitts.
 
boozeman said:
You know these things are cyclical. Warren is everyone’s non-balding Brock Bowers not the white version of Kyle Pitts.
Click to expand...

To me Bowers was a better prospect than Pitts, I think he only went as low as he did because he didn't run a 40 and he measured at like 6-3, 235. Bowers and Pitts were actually way more comparable to each other than Warren is to either of them.

Warren has the build and physicality to play inline while also being a dynamic receiving threat. Both Bowers and Pitts are basically just massive WR's who are nearly incapable of lining up as a traditional TE.

Warren isn't quite as explosive downfield but he's also like 255+ and brings legit blocking ability, he's kind of like a better version of TJ Hockenson.
 
Is Walker falling? I always see him in the second at this site now.

1739141164706.png
 
Simpleton said:
Big fan of Johnson, he'd be a great pick in the 3rd.
Click to expand...

Yeah, wouldn't be surprised to see him go in the second. I think at the very worst he goes in the third. Just too good not to. And NFL teams seem to care less about weight at WR than ever before.

I'm a big fan too.
 
One thing I've been thinking about lately is what would I do if the board is relatively bare at 12 with guys like Jeanty, McMillan and Warren gone. I don't think a guy like Jalon Walker is viable anymore given the type of scheme Eberflus runs, although maybe he'd surprise me with a vision of how he'd use someone like Walker next to Parsons.

There are a number of guys that I really like but 12 just seems a bit too rich, like you'd be taking any of them about 5-10 slots too early because of the depth. That includes Mike Green, Walter Nolen, Derrick Harmon, Malaki Starks, Kenneth Grant, James Pearce Jr., the assorted OL, Mykel Williams, Matthew Golden and Emeka Egbuka.

The guy I've really been digging in on after I noticed him during the playoff is Golden. At the very least I think he's better than Egbuka because he's more dynamic in contested situations and does an amazing job tracking the ball in traffic, but I'm really curious to see how he runs at the Combine.

If he has legit 4.3 speed he might vault up to near the top of that list of the "other guys, we've needed a WR who can stretch the field and take the tops off defenses for years but usually those types aren't overly physical, struggle in traffic or don't run great routes. Golden does all of that well, so if he has the speed to boot that could be very attractive.
 
Simpleton said:
If he has legit 4.3 speed he might vault up to near the top of that list of the "other guys, we've needed a WR who can stretch the field and take the tops off defenses for years but usually those types aren't overly physical, struggle in traffic or don't run great routes. Golden does all of that well, so if he has the speed to boot that could be very attractive.
Click to expand...

Yeah speed is where Egbuka and Golden will be battling for that number 3 WR spot in the draft to me. They both have their strengths. But ultimately I want to see how fast they really are. They are both dynamic in the short to intermediary.

Hunter and McMillan are the top two WRs obviously. And Burden for me is maybe the fifth. If I'm being honest I'm not really sure he will be my fifth. But regardless of forty, he isn't better than the other 4.
 
Cowboysrock55 said:
Yeah speed is where Egbuka and Golden will be battling for that number 3 WR spot in the draft to me. They both have their strengths. But ultimately I want to see how fast they really are. They are both dynamic in the short to intermediary.

Hunter and McMillan are the top two WRs obviously. And Burden for me is maybe the fifth. If I'm being honest I'm not really sure he will be my fifth. But regardless of forty, he isn't better than the other 4.
Click to expand...

I'll be curious to see if McMillan runs a 40 as well, London didn't and I wouldn't be surprised if McMillan opts out because he's probably a 4.55 type.

But yea, how the WR's and edge players test is probably the most intriguing thing to me this year.
 
Simpleton said:
I'll be curious to see if McMillan runs a 40 as well, London didn't and I wouldn't be surprised if McMillan opts out because he's probably a 4.55 type.
Click to expand...

Yeah and a 4.55 doesn't bother me with that type of receiver. Lamb was a 4.5 guy. McMillan is big and makes the acrobatic and crazy catches. I don't need him to be an elite deep threat. He will win deep balls regardless.

But a 6 ft or 6'1" WR, I want them to run in the 4.3-4.4 range. To me those are the speed guys. They don't need to be pure burners. But to add deep speed to everything they do well would really bump them up for me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom