2023 NFL Draft Chatter Thread...

Status
Not open for further replies.
shoop said:
I high one sits the longest? Mauch or Eongo would be my bet.

Side not Mauch is the new babyeater
Click to expand...

Are the slash guys sitting together or something? I get Jones and Smith but Van Ness and Murphy is an odd pairing then.

Also virtual invite? So they will have a camera in there house? Meh
 
For the people opposed to Mayer, if the evaluation is that he is likely to be a Mark Andrews-level player, is that enough to warrant taking him in the first?

Yes or no question, I don't care about him running a tenth of a second slower in the 40 or whatever.
 
Simpleton said:
For the people opposed to Mayer, if the evaluation is that he is likely to be a Mark Andrews-level player, is that enough to warrant taking him in the first?

Yes or no question, I don't care about him running a tenth of a second slower in the 40 or whatever.
Click to expand...

Yes. Major win there if he is Mark Andrews.
 
boozeman said:
Click to expand...


I'm not sure why Stroud is being targeted for example.

On the other hand I know S2 wants this stuff confidential. For obvious reasons too, if Stroud ends up a stud they don't want his score being out there showing the system is flawed.
 
Last edited:
Simpleton said:
Because there's a huge drop off from him and Young to the other two so I think teams want him to drop, assuming Young goes 1.
Click to expand...

That would make sense. Certainly seems like a bunch of negative stuff at Stroud all of a sudden a week before the draft. Doesn't impact us but it is interesting.
 
If Stroud drops to Dallas cuz he's half a retard ,do you take him?
 
Bill Shatner said:
If Stroud drops to Dallas cuz he's half a retard ,do you take him?
Click to expand...

Yes, worth the risk because the upside is too good. If he is what I think he could be you get a rookie contract QB for 5 years and get out of the 50 mil QB business.
 
Cowboysrock55 said:
Yes, worth the risk because the upside is too good. If he is what I think he could be you get a rookie contract QB for 5 years and get out of the 50 mil QB business.
Click to expand...

5 years from now it wont be 50 mill. We will be in the 60s.
 
Rev said:
5 years from now it wont be 50 mill. We will be in the 60s.
Click to expand...
At this point how much a QB earns will continue to rise.

Perhaps in the next CBA something will change, but this is what it is.

I don't give a shit about the QB. Every team will have a sunk cost by the time any QB worth a shit hits their second contract.

I am talking about the dumb sizeable investments on non-essential positions, which means anything other than a QB, LT or Edge.
 
Simpleton said:
I assume that means Arizona would want to take an OT after a trade down, not that a team wants to move up to 3 to take an OT, which would be insane.
Click to expand...
I can’t think of any of them as anywhere near the top 10.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom