2022 Draft Big Boards, Position Rankings & Mocks

Status
Not open for further replies.
Only did through the 5th round. Round 1 I had my choice of Linderbaum, Green, and Johnson. I think G is a higher priority than C. I'd give Biadasz one more year. Moore in the second and Chenal in the third should shore up those positions well. I never had a DT I was excited about fall though I considered Haskell Garrett in the 4th.
  • DAL

    24.
    Zion Johnson
    OG Boston College

  • DAL

    56.
    Skyy Moore
    WR Western Michigan

  • DAL

    92.
    Leo Chenal
    LB Wisconsin
    trade icon
  • DAL

    129.
    Charlie Kolar
    TE Iowa State

  • DAL

    155.
    Sterling Weatherford
    S Miami-Oh

  • DAL

    167.
    Thayer Munford
    OG Ohio State

  • DAL

    176.
    Otito Ogbonnia
    DT UCLA

  • DAL

    178.
    Jerrion Ealy
    RB Mississippi

  • 2023 GB 5th
 
I know Sky Moore would be a really nice slot receiver but I can't get excited about him. It's Randall Cobb. Who was absolutely a good young player and a good player for Dak. But still just not that exciting to me.
 
 
Iamtdg said:
Click to expand...


I've been saying Linderbaum was overrated for months, way back when he was talked about as a top 10 or even top 5 pick at times during the season. But if he's there at 24 I'm taking him, presuming we're sticking with a Zone-heavy blocking scheme.

There are a few guys I'd take over him who could reasonably be there (Davis, Karlaftis, Lloyd) but he's definitely near the top of the list.
 
boozeman said:

Look away….it is hideous.
Click to expand...

That reminds me of some of the cheap knockoff designs of the early 90s when Starter was a big deal.
 
Simpleton said:
I've been saying Linderbaum was overrated for months, way back when he was talked about as a top 10 or even top 5 pick at times during the season. But if he's there at 24 I'm taking him, presuming we're sticking with a Zone-heavy blocking scheme.

There are a few guys I'd take over him who could reasonably be there (Davis, Karlaftis, Lloyd) but he's definitely near the top of the list.
Click to expand...

I'm an Iowa fan, I have a lot of respect for the guy. But for me, I'd rather Green or Zion. Not to say I wouldn't take my guy from Iowa but to me these players are on similar levels and we need a guard more. Plus I love size on the middle of the line. 296 pounds scares me a little against 330 NTs.
 
Cowboysrock55 said:
I'm an Iowa fan, I have a lot of respect for the guy. But for me, I'd rather Green or Zion. Not to say I wouldn't take my guy from Iowa but to me these players are on similar levels and we need a guard more. Plus I love size on the middle of the line. 296 pounds scares me a little against 330 NTs.
Click to expand...

Yea I wouldn't be against either of them over Linderbaum, even if I do think he's a slightly better prospect.
 
The other thing these rankings show is how much depth there is at WR compared to OL.

Guys like Olave and Burks are legit 1st rounders, but the drop-off from them to a Watson or Moore isn't as stark as from Kenyon/Zion to who, Sean Rhyan or some such?

Just wait until the 2nd or 3rd for a WR.
 
Simpleton said:
The other thing these rankings show is how much depth there is at WR compared to OL.

Guys like Olave and Burks are legit 1st rounders, but the drop-off from them to a Watson or Moore isn't as stark as from Kenyon/Zion to who, Sean Rhyan or some such?

Just wait until the 2nd or 3rd for a WR.
Click to expand...
If they want a starting caliber OL, they don’t have a choice.
 
Simpleton said:
The other thing these rankings show is how much depth there is at WR compared to OL.

Guys like Olave and Burks are legit 1st rounders, but the drop-off from them to a Watson or Moore isn't as stark as from Kenyon/Zion to who, Sean Rhyan or some such?

Just wait until the 2nd or 3rd for a WR.
Click to expand...

I like Salyer at guard
 
boozeman said:


Interesting.
Click to expand...


Big dude but it's kind of crazy to think a box safety is going top 5 in the draft. He can play 2 deep safety too but we have seen some great safeties in drafts. I can't ever remember a 4.7 guy ever going in the first round much less top 10. It's a weird year.
 
boozeman said:


Interesting.
Click to expand...


Yea, he looked like he had plenty enough range at Notre Dame to play basically anything you'd want out of a safety from single-high to in the box, but consistently testing in the 4.6-4.7 range is definitely not great.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom