Genghis Khan
The worst version of myself
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 52,330
Not certain if I should be encouraged or frightened.
Definitely frightened because Alarcon is not a player.
Not certain if I should be encouraged or frightened.
Connor Williams probably netted one or two unfair penalties because of his reputation for holding. I wonder if that has worked against the entire team as well. As for an actual ref conspiracy, that sounds like post-game loser talk.It's no coincidence that holding was the refs penalty of choice against us all last year.
I am telling you, they are trained to watch our LG, no matter who it is.Smith's technique is sloppy here with high pads and high hands, getting him in a position where he's belly to belly and making it more likely that a flag is thrown as the DL tries to move one way or the other.
I don't personally think it's a flag, it's extremely borderline and I've seen way worse ignored, but there is room to clean up his technique so he isn't getting himself into compromising positions like that.
Smith's technique is sloppy here with high pads and high hands, getting him in a position where he's belly to belly and making it more likely that a flag is thrown as the DL tries to move one way or the other.
I don't personally think it's a flag, it's extremely borderline and I've seen way worse ignored, but there is room to clean up his technique so he isn't getting himself into compromising positions like that.
In no way should that be a hold. It's not even borderline in my book. I see this and I seriously wonder what the hell the refs are thinking. If that's a hold you might as well just give up now because you're not winning football games. Because the refs don't call that against other teams.
In no way should that be a hold. It's not even borderline in my book. I see this and I seriously wonder what the hell the refs are thinking. If that's a hold you might as well just give up now because you're not winning football games. Because the refs don't call that against other teams.
Now this one I get a little. It's not holding but the guy goes to the ground. In a bang bang play I could see how the ref may think a guy got held but didn't. A play like this I can at least understand a refs thinking a little. Although I'd say if you can't see a hold don't call it. You shouldn't call penalties based on the end result if you didn't see what happened. But again, I get it. Like a WR who flops and PI is called despite the DB not actually grabbing him.
I think it's borderline but it happened for a split second and it's the type of play they should ignore every time.
I'm the opposite. I don't see this one at all.
Why the fuck would they assume holding though? If you don't see it, don't call it.
There are way too many damn flags as it is without their assuming anything.
Even putting fairness or Cowboys bias aside, it's making the games unwatchable.