BipolarFuk
Demoted
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 11,464
“Some are new to politics completely. They’re children of the Great Recession. And they are living in their parents’ basement. They feel they got their education and the jobs that are available to them are not at all what they envisioned for themselves. And they don’t see much of a future. I met with a group of young black millennials today and you know one of the young women said, “You know, none of us feel that we have the job that we should have gotten out of college. And we don’t believe the job market is going to give us much of a chance.”
“So that is a mindset that is really affecting their politics. And so if you’re feeling like you’re consigned to, you know, being a barista, or you know, some other job that doesn’t pay a lot, and doesn’t have some other ladder of opportunity attached to it, then the idea that maybe, just maybe, you could be part of a political revolution is pretty appealing.
The Wikileak this is referencing actually came off as empathetic. It had a "no wonder they're pissed off." tone to it.
Not exactly an unfair portrayal.
I think the big "bombshell" was her Wall Street speech transcript, which proved she was as duplicitous as everyone already knew she was.Still waiting for the bombshell email to drop so far they have been pretty lame.
If something is going to curtail her track to winning it has to drop this week so that it can have time to make a full impact.
There would have literally been no fallout. Trump has done everything right wing evangelicals have been fighting against. Evangelicals wouldn't give up on their golden calf no matter if he shat on Pat Robertson's face..It wasn't a "bombshell" because nobody seemed to care, but her staffers openly talked about starting left-wing Catholic PACs to undermine the Church hierarchy with what they called a "Catholic Spring." It basically confirmed what a lot of orthodox Catholic commentators were saying all along, while they were being accused of paranoia by members of these PACs.
This matters to me, and it's ultimately the reason Hillary won't get my "rejection of Trump" vote. Imagine the fallout if Trump had been found to be working to undermine the authority of non-Christian religion in America.

There would have literally been no fallout. Trump has done everything right wing evangelicals have been fighting against. Evangelicals wouldn't give up on their golden calf no matter if he shat on Pat Robertson's face..
I'm talking about media coverage, not support.
But we've reached such a saturation with Trump outrage. It would die in a news cycle. Just like every unforgivable thing he always does. By the time he hit the General campaign his "fallout" was like a game of mad libs that the media and the GOP played on a weekly basis.
"The Trump campaign is scrambling after footage surfaced of Trump LITERALLY SHITTING ON PAT ROBERTSON'S FACE. When reached for comment Paul Ryan condemned Trump saying that LITERALLY SHITTING ON PAT ROBERTSON'S FACE does not fall in line conservative values. Ryan has not withdrawn his endorsement."

Could someone explain to me why Republican presidents (vs. Big Government) rack up the biggest debt?
Shouldn't it be the other way around?
I haven't seen the numbers on the current administration lately but the deficient was headed for a record amount at one point.
He added 68% to the biggest number in history since it has steadily grown since WWII, every president (with little exception) will do that, but not % wise which would be easier to compare, there GW went 101%.
Clinton 32%
Reagan 186%
GHB 54%
Carter 43%
Amounts and percentages are thrown around with a lot of spin. The actual dollars are still increasing the overall deficit at a record pace even though the increase may not be as high a percent this year but still a deficit. It's confusing. Just look at the actual dollar figure to get a truer representation.