- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 64,375
ESPN is reporting teams are trying to trade up to the top of the fourth round for Cook. I swear the Browns are just in love with floating that rumor to drum up interest.
I see that Bullard went after 67. I would rather have had him than Collins. I really shouldn't have gone and looked. Ugh.
Yeah, I can't see them letting the fifth go by without a pick.
That basically means their first 4th gets traded away and they drop way down in the round if they can pull a trade off.
ESPN is reporting teams are trying to trade up to the top of the fourth round for Cook. I swear the Browns are just in love with floating that rumor to drum up interest.
I see that Bullard went after 67. I would rather have had him than Collins. I really shouldn't have gone and looked. Ugh.
Unless they move up from the sixth, I dunno how they get a fifth unless they get it for Leary.I think trading down at this point would be pretty dumb. We have 5 picks in the next 3 rounds. That 1st 4th is way more valuable than an extra 5th.
We're going to come away from today with 2 CBs, a WR, a DE, and a QB. And either a LB or TE.
You know this. Accept it. We just don't know the order.
I don't know why anyone would want to trade up for Cook. But trading up for some QB at the top of the fourth is like a tradition. Matt Barkley was that guy a few years ago.
Unless they move up from the sixth, I dunno how they get a fifth unless they get it for Leary.
The Browns were floating the same shit at the top of the second round too and ended up picking someone. I really like Cook but it seems silly to me that a team would pass on someone they think could be a franchise QB until the fourth round and then decide that they just must have him.
Fuck that 2 CB thing. But you are probably right.
I wouldn't put it past Dallas to take a OG here either. McGovern in particular since Seumelo went to the Eagles in the 3rd.