- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 144,315
That would be so beautiful...
~wipes tear~
Well, no.
You get the gigantic Chaz Green turd dump right in your mouth.
That would be so beautiful...
~wipes tear~
Bleh. Don't like this pick, as there were other players I would have preferred. But I'm not going to complain about a pick along the lines. Especially one that I don't know much about. I'll defer to the scouting department here. They have done pretty well lately with OL picks.
Pretty underwhelming, tho.
He was a solid player most thought we could've had in the 2nd. Chaz f'ing Green is no Frederick.

Is anyone questioning our o-line evaluations?
Free can go down anytime.
Not in the third fucking round with a guy that honestly is nowhere near being in the top 100 in this draft.
Can they really be thinking McFadden and Randle are good enough?

I'm baffled right now.
I just can't understand what this team is thinking in regards to the RB position.
I wouldn't call him a waste of a pick. Taken too early? Sure. But he very well could turn out to be a player. Our scouts have done pretty well lately. Think back to our most recent complete waste of a pick, Anthony Hitchens.Yep.
They keep thinking there is "depth" at RB.
Well, you do that you end up with the dregs at the bottom of the barrel.
Chaz Green was a complete waste of a pick.
we said the same of hitchens
Ok scout.![]()
Ok scout.![]()
Yep.
They keep thinking there is "depth" at RB.
Well, you do that you end up with the dregs at the bottom of the barrel.
Chaz Green was a complete waste of a pick.
I wouldn't call him a waste of a pick. Taken too early? Sure. But he very well could turn out to be a player. Our scouts have done pretty well lately. Think back to our most recent complete waste of a pick, Anthony Hitchens.
we said the same of hitchens
So, you had him higher?
Not in the third fucking round with a guy that honestly is nowhere near being in the top 100 in this draft.