2023 Random Cowboys Stuff Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cowboysrock55 said:
Yeah, I assumed Ferg and Hendershot were attached at the hips. He should be there too. Frankly Gallup needs to get his ass out there and put in some work too. His lazy ass route running was no helpful to our teams success. I'll give Lamb a pass because he actually looks great even though I'd love to see him and Dak continue building chemistry.
Click to expand...
Gallup just had surgery.
 
boozeman said:
So a second and Dorance Armstrong for Jeudy?
Click to expand...
tenor.gif
 
boozeman said:


xsU1G0v.gif
Click to expand...


$10M on a one year deal isn't that different from what someone like Sanders got and I'd rather have Pollard than Sanders. They knew they'd be releasing Elliott and couldn't risk losing Pollard too, they can always negotiate a 3-4 year deal based on what's going on in the market right now, or just let it roll with the franchise tag.

But losing Pollard isn't an option.
 
Simpleton said:
$10M on a one year deal isn't that different from what someone like Sanders got and I'd rather have Pollard than Sanders. They knew they'd be releasing Elliott and couldn't risk losing Pollard too, they can always negotiate a 3-4 year deal based on what's going on in the market right now, or just let it roll with the franchise tag.

But losing Pollard isn't an option.
Click to expand...
I look at it that we need Pollard too, but 10 vs 6 is significant. I guess thats the tag-onomics we have to absorb.
 
Simpleton said:
$10M on a one year deal isn't that different from what someone like Sanders got and I'd rather have Pollard than Sanders. They knew they'd be releasing Elliott and couldn't risk losing Pollard too, they can always negotiate a 3-4 year deal based on what's going on in the market right now, or just let it roll with the franchise tag.

But losing Pollard isn't an option.
Click to expand...
Exactly.

But, you know… :angry
 
  • Angry
Reactions: p1_
Simpleton said:
$10M on a one year deal isn't that different from what someone like Sanders got and I'd rather have Pollard than Sanders. They knew they'd be releasing Elliott and couldn't risk losing Pollard too, they can always negotiate a 3-4 year deal based on what's going on in the market right now, or just let it roll with the franchise tag.

But losing Pollard isn't an option.
Click to expand...

Correct.

I just did not like the idea of franchising an injured player.

The market for backs ain't getting bigger.

Depending on what happens in the draft, he could get Schultz'ed.
 
Browns must be desperate for Dline talent.
 


Can anyone help me interpret this Tweet?

I don't speak idiot.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom