wasn't his guilty verdict overturned before Goodell rendered judgement? Also if Goodell wanted to enforce based on that cursory fake trial, he shouldn't have waited a year while Hardy was already suspended by the Panthers.Brady was utterly jobbed for basically not doing anything and regarding an almost silly rule. Hardy did something kind of fucked up by any standard. He was found guilty (retard NC court system aside), thus opening himself up to Goodell's judgement.
The only argument he could win would be consistency of punishment. Ray Rice's "standard" of a two game suspension was hotly contested, so the four games he's got might not be worth challenging.
Brady was utterly jobbed for basically not doing anything and regarding an almost silly rule. Hardy did something kind of fucked up by any standard. He was found guilty (retard NC court system aside), thus opening himself up to Goodell's judgement.
The only argument he could win would be consistency of punishment. Ray Rice's "standard" of a two game suspension was hotly contested, so the four games he's got might not be worth challenging.
that retard NC court system is a key issue though. That "conviction" is meaningless. If you're not found guilty by a jury of you're peers you're still innocent until proven guilty under the constitution.
Technically the way the law works, that conviction never actually happened. That's the whole point of the process.
It's irritating that people keep acting like it was a legit jury conviction that was overturned on appeal to a higher court.
that retard NC court system is a key issue though. That "conviction" is meaningless. If you're not found guilty by a jury of you're peers you're still innocent until proven guilty under the constitution.
Preaching to the choir here.
I think it's idiotic, but it's enough to get Goodell involved regardless of whatever happened later.
Not sure how the Brady decision changes Hardy's appeal.
The judge claimed Brady wasn't warned he could face a 4 game suspension for deflating footballs-- IOW breaking an NFL rule. Players who commit felonies clearly face all kinds of fines and suspensions.
Hardy needs to pursue the angle that technically he broke no law. Especially since Goodell suspended him after the court case went through due process.
Brady's decision seems to be completely different-- other than the perception that the NFL is now somehow more vulnerable to court decisions.
Not sure how the Brady decision changes Hardy's appeal.
The judge claimed Brady wasn't warned he could face a 4 game suspension for deflating footballs-- IOW breaking an NFL rule. Players who commit felonies clearly face all kinds of fines and suspensions.
Hardy needs to pursue the angle that technically he broke no law. Especially since Goodell suspended him after the court case went through due process.
Brady's decision seems to be completely different-- other than the perception that the NFL is now somehow more vulnerable to court decisions.
Not sure how the Brady decision changes Hardy's appeal.
The judge claimed Brady wasn't warned he could face a 4 game suspension for deflating footballs-- IOW breaking an NFL rule. Players who commit felonies clearly face all kinds of fines and suspensions.
Hardy needs to pursue the angle that technically he broke no law. Especially since Goodell suspended him after the court case went through due process.
Brady's decision seems to be completely different-- other than the perception that the NFL is now somehow more vulnerable to court decisions.
I'm pretty sure Hardy was charged with a misdemeanor, not a felony.
And, you would be correct. Here's your autographed Bobby Carpenter jersey, courtesy of the DCC.
I'm pretty sure Hardy was charged with a misdemeanor, not a felony.
WTF? My Bobby Carpenter jersey wasn't autographed!
~flips table. Throws bitch on futon full of guns~