I mean, he was obviously completely wrong.
Oh, I gotcha. Sorry, I misread you. You are correct. But, his point is a good one even if the entitled black people and the disingenuous liberal white suburban women don’t see it.Wrong about time running out on people listening to them, having sympathy for them, etc. Just look at 2020 and the years after that.
He also was talking about moral currency being gone. There is little to no contrary viewpoint that points out anything that is actually happening, other than saying that by pointing out things that are legitimately happening is racism.Wrong about time running out on people listening to them, having sympathy for them, etc. Just look at 2020 and the years after that.
You mean what he said about acting the fool?But, his point is a good one even if the entitled black people and the disingenuous liberal white suburban women don’t see it.
Why are you being so negative today?You mean what he said about acting the fool?
I'd say I guess that hasn't mattered. The grievance politics are as big as ever, or at least were as of just a few years ago.
Besides, the whole society acts the fool more than 30 years ago, whites included.
And booze, I guess I didn't get what exactly your second sentence was referring to.
Ha, I'm really not trying to be difficult. I'm just saying I think his premise was wrong. He was afraid if black leaders didn't act more dignified, white people in particular would lose sympathy for them going forward. I don't think that happened at all.Why are you being so negative today?
In all seriousness, my point is had they heeded what he was saying maybe it wouldn’t be like it is today and there wouldn’t be nearly as much fatigue.
Of course they've had a new generation of race Marxists (especially white lib women) shouting from the rooftops to help their cause.

"Kindergarten graduation"
![]()