Machota: How the Cowboys plan to address biggest hole on their roster

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
130,793

DeMarvion Overshown of the Dallas Cowboys warms up before the game against the Las Vegas Raiders at Allegiant Stadium on November 17, 2025 in Las Vegas, Nevada.

DeMarvion Overshown played in just six games last season after returning from a knee injury in the 2024 season. Ian Maule / Getty Images

Jon Machota
By Jon Machota
March 31, 2026 Updated April 1, 2026 3:41 pm CDT


PHOENIX — Considering all of the Dallas Cowboys’ defensive needs entering the offseason, an argument can be made that they improved in some areas. No argument can be made for inside linebacker.

Not only do the Cowboys need an immediate impact starter, they need depth. There are only three on the roster: DeMarvion Overshown, Shemar James and Justin Barron. That’s a very thin situation for a defense making the move to a 3-4 scheme.

“Look, we made a run at some guys in free agency,” Cowboys coach Brian Schottenheimer said Monday at the NFL’s annual meetings at the Arizona Biltmore. “Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t. What do you do? You adjust. It’s something we’re working on 365 (days), 24-7. We’ve got a good plan. We’re not done. We’re always open for business.

“We recognize that we need to fill some holes there.”

The Cowboys made attempts to sign three veteran free-agent inside linebackers. Devin Lloyd signed a three-year, $41.9 million deal with the Carolina Panthers. Former Georgia teammates Quay Walker (three years, $40.5 million) and Nakobe Dean (three years, $36.03 million) signed deals with the Las Vegas Raiders.

“I wouldn’t say disappointing,” Cowboys executive vice president Stephen Jones said Monday. “Any time you’re in the hunt for something you’d like to think things could work out, but we also look at every situation differently. Obviously in those particular cases, they just didn’t work out.”

Cowboys owner Jerry Jones said in January that there is “incentive” to “bust the budget” to try to improve their defensive roster. It sounded good at the time. Dallas was fresh off arguably the worst defensive season in franchise history.

“We’ll do some dramatic things,” Jerry Jones added. “… Finances are no object.”

But the closest thing to budget-busting moves have been trading a fourth-round pick to the Green Bay Packers for edge rusher Rashan Gary and signing veteran safety Jalen Thompson to a three-year deal worth up to $36 million.

Why didn’t they bust the budget to sign any of the linebackers?

“Hey, we were trying,” Schottenheimer said. “And if they don’t take the money, they don’t take the money. I felt like the offers we made were very, very fair. They were big numbers. We were very competitive. It’s hard to compete with a couple of former teammates (Walker and Dean) that wanted to go play together. And there’s different reasons about why you lose these guys. But we were very competitive in those deals. But that’s the business. … We’re far from being done.”

No. 2 wide receiver was a significant need last year at this time. Had Tetairoa McMillan been available at Pick 12, he would’ve been a Cowboy. But he went eighth overall to the Panthers. Dallas responded by trading for George Pickens two weeks later. The Cowboys maintain they have plans in place in case they are wiped out at the inside linebacker position after next month’s NFL Draft.

“The plan is to add skill at that position,” Stephen Jones said, “whether it’s the draft, whether it’s free agency, whether it’s a trade, or a combination of all of the above, we’ll look at all avenues. … A lot of moving parts to it, but obviously we’re looking at that linebacker spot. It’s on our radar. But for the most part, I do feel like we checked a lot of boxes in terms of what we needed to do on the defensive side of the ball.”

The type of player they’re missing is more than just an off-the-ball linebacker. They need one who can be the quarterback of the defense. That has been Sean Lee and then Leighton Vander Esch in the past. It was Kenneth Murray last season and Eric Kendricks in 2024. A long-term solution is needed and that could mean the best scenario is drafting one with one of Dallas’ two first-round picks. The Cowboys believe the right draft prospect could handle that responsibility.


Ohio State’s Sonny Styles is probably the best at the position in this year’s draft class. But according to most mock drafts, he will be gone by Dallas’ first pick, No. 12 overall. Next up would likely be Georgia’s CJ Allen. Pick No. 20 could be the spot for him. No. 12 is probably too rich. The Cowboys’ goal is to avoid drafting for need. They don’t want to reach for a position. Just because inside linebacker is clearly their biggest roster hole, they can’t just take the best available linebacker when they’re on the clock.

That means they could potentially get wiped out at the position, leaving their best plan of attack to search the trade market after the draft. Perhaps a team that finds itself deeper at the position after adding to its roster. Either way, Dallas is in a tough spot with the draft less than a month away and all of the notable free agents already signed.

The last thing you want to give new defensive coordinator Christian Parker is a huge question mark at one of his most important positions.

“I don’t think it has to be before the draft,” Stephen Jones said Monday. “I don’t think there’s any timing on that. I go back to player acquisition is 365 days a year. We’ve gotten good players after the draft in terms of players that have played in the league. There’s always opportunities for trades. We’ll continue to look at every avenue. Obviously the draft is one of them as well.

“At the end of the day, I think we checked a lot of boxes. I think we really improved our football team. I feel really good about what we accomplished. Between trades, between negotiations, between signing our own guys, doing things we felt were needed, I think we got a lot done.”

But one glaring area of need remains.

Jon Machota
By Jon Machota
Staff Writer, Cowboys

 
“I don’t think it has to be before the draft,” Stephen Jones said Monday. “I don’t think there’s any timing on that. I go back to player acquisition is 365 days a year. We’ve gotten good players after the draft in terms of players that have played in the league. There’s always opportunities for trades. We’ll continue to look at every avenue. Obviously the draft is one of them as well.
That's a smart comment. Bottom line is look for the upgrade before, after, and during the draft. Don't panic if it's not there before the draft and don't panic if you miss completely during the draft.

It's one position, you'll find someone by trade, draft, or whatever.
 
That's a smart comment. Bottom line is look for the upgrade before, after, and during the draft. Don't panic if it's not there before the draft and don't panic if you miss completely during the draft.

It's one position, you'll find someone by trade, draft, or whatever.

I don't mind addressing it after the draft. But like you said, the most important thing is to not panic during the draft. Don't reach for a LBer at 20 just because you don't have one. If you can't trade down and there isn't a LBer there worthy of the pick, just pretend like it's not a need and draft someone else. I do think you can address the position later via a trade. Just don't ruin the draft by targeting one position.

And I realize people will be very mad it we get through pick 12, 20 and 92 and haven't taken a LBer. Hell I expect to take a LBer in the first 3 rounds. But if we don't, it's just something we will have to be aggressive about after the draft.
 
I don't mind addressing it after the draft. But like you said, the most important thing is to not panic during the draft. Don't reach for a LBer at 20 just because you don't have one. If you can't trade down and there isn't a LBer there worthy of the pick, just pretend like it's not a need and draft someone else. I do think you can address the position later via a trade. Just don't ruin the draft by targeting one position.

And I realize people will be very mad it we get through pick 12, 20 and 92 and haven't taken a LBer. Hell I expect to take a LBer in the first 3 rounds. But if we don't, it's just something we will have to be aggressive about after the draft.

Unless we get kind of lucky I could easily see LB not line up for us in the draft.
 
Unless we get kind of lucky I could easily see LB not line up for us in the draft.

I agree unless we trade down. And I also wouldn't be surprised if we use our third or fourth on a LBer who we don't necessarily view as playing next to Overshown. That third/fourth round guy may be a sub package LBer and we may trade for a 2 down thumping LBer after the draft. I honestly would not be shocked.

Hell could even end up a little like RB last year where you don't see a LBer until the fifth round and we are drafting 2 in the later rounds.

Honestly I'm hoping for a trade down though. I love the second and third rounds. I want more picks there.
 
We're going to reach a bit for Hill at 20 unless someone who should've obviously gone around 15 drops.

I hope not but I also really like Hill. If that's the LBer this coaching staff picks I think he is the one I would be most excited about. He has the highest upside at LBer in this draft outside of Styles, in my opinion. Plus he is a damn good blitzer. I wouldn't be upset with Hill at all. I'd be more impressed if we traded down and then took Hill. But I could see Hill becoming a special player.
 
I hope not but I also really like Hill. If that's the LBer this coaching staff picks I think he is the one I would be most excited about. He has the highest upside at LBer in this draft outside of Styles, in my opinion. Plus he is a damn good blitzer. I wouldn't be upset with Hill at all. I'd be more impressed if we traded down and then took Hill. But I could see Hill becoming a special player.

I wouldn't be upset but it would feel like leaving value on the table for sure.

And that could just be my perception that Hill, Allen and Rodriguez are mostly interchangeable and we'd be much better off adding an extra pick or two and seeing which one falls, but maybe the team has Hill or one of the other two ranked 18th overall or whatever.
 
I wouldn't be upset but it would feel like leaving value on the table for sure.

And that could just be my perception that Hill, Allen and Rodriguez are mostly interchangeable and we'd be much better off adding an extra pick or two and seeing which one falls, but maybe the team has Hill or one of the other two ranked 18th overall or whatever.

That's my perception as well. I think you'll see ultimately one of those three go in the first round and I don't think any are at risk of going before 20.

So yeah, unless the draft goes kind of screwy, I'd rather see a trade down and take one of them. And I'm not upset either if it's Josiah Trotter or Golday frankly.

I actually bounce back and forth between if I like Rodriguez or Hill most after Styles. CJ Allen is in the group but I've always preferred Hill and Rodriguez to him. And Trotter is starting to climb into that group for me as well. And I've always liked Golday.

So while Hill and Rodriguez are sort of the top of my LBers after Styles, I think I really have a group of 5 guys I really like. I doubt any of them make it to 92. But it also means that some will be available in the later second and even early third.
 
If we take somebody like Rodriguez, Hill, or Allen at 20, I won't even give a shit. Sure, we all want to trade down, gather more draft ammo, and still get the guy we targeted. But that doesn't always work out. Either the player(s) get taken, or we can't find a trade partner. We don't know. But if we do take one at 20, what I do know is that our biggest flaw on defense is now filled with a very capable player.
 
If we take somebody like Rodriguez, Hill, or Allen at 20, I won't even give a shit. Sure, we all want to trade down, gather more draft ammo, and still get the guy we targeted. But that doesn't always work out. Either the player(s) get taken, or we can't find a trade partner. We don't know. But if we do take one at 20, what I do know is that our biggest flaw on defense is now filled with a very capable player.

I'll be disappointed we didn't trade down and acquire more capital.

But I won't be disappointed at all that we added someone I think can be a really good starter at a position that has been a dire need for a couple of years now. And in a couple of years no one will care that the LBer was taken at 20.
 
I'll be disappointed we didn't trade down and acquire more capital.

But I won't be disappointed at all that we added someone I think can be a really good starter at a position that has been a dire need for a couple of years now. And in a couple of years no one will care that the LBer was taken at 20.
We'd all be disappointed. Of course it would be ideal, but we would have no idea if there was a trade available there to position us better or not. But we'll hear about our lazy, retarded F.O. just the same if it works out that way.
 
We'd all be disappointed. Of course it would be ideal, but we would have no idea if there was a trade available there to position us better or not. But we'll hear about our lazy, retarded F.O. just the same if it works out that way.

Yeah I just want more picks. I think all fans do. The draft is more fun with more picks.

But in the end nailing the picks with impact players is more important than anything. Which is why some teams trade up in the draft.
 
The problem is that I'm not so sure there's any scenario where Hill, Allen or Rodriguez will be the best defender available on the board at 20.
 
The problem is that I'm not so sure there's any scenario where Hill, Allen or Rodriguez will be the best defender available on the board at 20.

Not in our opinions exactly but I could see some teams having them as the top ranked defender.

It's not like we're talking about guys who should go a full round later, we're talking top 30-40 guys and there's always variation once you start getting into the late 1/early 2 area.
 
As long as it’s not an obvious fall for a highly ranked guy that we’d pass on, I still am not too worried about it. The top 10-15 guys are pretty much agreed upon by so called draft experts. 16-40ish are pretty subjective. Different rankings are all over the place. For instance, R Mason Thomas is all over the place. He’s being mocked in the first thru the third and all parts in between. Where does he truly belong?

Look back to when we took Travis Frederick. We were universally panned for taking him when we did by the pundits and fans. That worked out pretty well for us. Rare autoimmune disease, notwithstanding.

We have no idea how actual NFL teams view these guys.
 
We're going to reach a bit for Hill at 20 unless someone who should've obviously gone around 15 drops.
That's definitely a reach, but it underscores how picks 20-50 are so similar in this and seemingly every draft in recent years.

You could take a pet cat from that range at 20 and many wouldn't bat an eye, understanding if you can't trade down you won't be able to find that prospect at 92.

The difference in this draft is there are elite offensive and CB players at each of the Cowboys' draft selections that likely will have available juicy trade up targets:

12: Lemon/Tyson at WR, McCoy at CB, Mauigoa/Fano if they fall at OT, Faulk at EDGE
20: Proctor at OT, Boston/Branch/Cooper at WR, Terrell/Hood at CB, TJ Parker at EDGE

These are legit difference making targets for teams like the Rams, Bills, Broncos, and others who are close but only need that one more WR, CB, or EDGE starter to get them over the hump.

Didn't have them last year, and this year Dallas could be in position to trade twice.
 
Back
Top Bottom