Random Politics Stuff Thread...

Can't stand that old fucking communist.

He's also such a fake tough guy. You know they bought him off that year they installed Hilary ahead of him and he barely said a word.
 
Chocolate Lab said:
Click to expand...



I believe in the first amendment obviously. The right to peaceably assemble is important.

But it was never meant to be for professional agitators who throw ridiculous temper tantrums whenever they don't get their way because the majority disagrees with them.

These protests aren't democracy at work. On the contrary, they're tyranny. It's an extreme minority trying to impose its will on the majority. It's an abuse of the first amendment. It's the opposite of democracy and these pieces of shit can rot in fucking hell.
 
Genghis Khan said:
I believe in the first amendment obviously. The right to peaceably assemble is important.

But it was never meant to be for professional agitators who throw ridiculous temper tantrums whenever they don't get their way because the majority disagrees with them.

These protests aren't democracy at work. On the contrary, they're tyranny. It's an extreme minority trying to impose its will on the majority. It's an abuse of the first amendment. It's the opposite of democracy and these pieces of shit can rot in fucking hell.
Click to expand...
Sounds like you are talking about 1/6 here. :lol
 
NoDak said:
Were they wrong to do this? Yes.

Was it an actual violent insurrection in an attempt to overthrow the government? No.
Click to expand...
It also wasn't astroturf funded and organized by a globalist USA-hating billionaire.
 
I don't see how you guys can say with a straight face "THIS IS LIKE 1/6!!" and then not contrast how no one is being charged.

If it's like 1/6 where are the charges?

Or if 1/6 was like this, how come people on 1/6 got charges when none were warranted like here?

Explanation please, not Picard emojis, or you once again are hypocritical pieces of shit like always.
 
I don't know if anyone in Manhattan was charged or not, honestly. Obviously, if what is being said is true, people involved should have been wearing cuffs.

The point was, GK's description above accurately described the people and events on January 6.

Does this satisfy your begging for someone to please argue with you?
 
Irving Cowboy said:
I don't know if anyone in Manhattan was charged or not, honestly.
Click to expand...
I don’t know, either. Maybe because this wasn’t splashed all over the TV and internet 24/7 like the other supposedly comparable event? Maybe because this one involved another group of people that didn’t fit a certain criteria? Just a thought.
 
I couldn't see the entire crowd so there is no way to estimate the size, at least not from that video.

What's funny is how "Your chance to fight Nazi's" and "Abolish ICE" = dangerous people, yet "Hang Mike Pence" gets an eyeroll.
 
Irving Cowboy said:
I couldn't see the entire crowd so there is no way to estimate the size, at least not from that video.

What's funny is how "Your chance to fight Nazi's" and "Abolish ICE" = dangerous people, yet "Hang Mike Pence" gets an eyeroll.
Click to expand...
I would think the difference would be actual elected officials calling for the violence on one side. Either on the street or in the press. I don't remember hearing any Republicans yelling out "Hang Mike Pence." I could be wrong.
 
Irving Cowboy said:
I couldn't see the entire crowd so there is no way to estimate the size, at least not from that video.

What's funny is how "Your chance to fight Nazi's" and "Abolish ICE" = dangerous people, yet "Hang Mike Pence" gets an eyeroll.
Click to expand...

They both should get exactly the same reaction, dummy, and that's the whole point.

Inappropriate language and rhetoric that should be condemned without rising to the level of aggravating factor to insinuate criminal motive, especially serious criminal conduct ie insurrection.

If the left said "Man, those Trump protestors on January 6th were dangerous! Someone could have gotten hurt, and worse, they were misinformed, the thing they were protesting for was not even a possible outcome! What a bunch of ignorant twits!" then the following 6 years of Jan 6 wailing and gnashing of teeth never would have occurred. Everyone would have been in agreement except the few score morons who were actually present that day (and perhaps Trump himself).

Of course then the left wouldn't have been able to trade on it politically, so there's that.

Instead we get multi year jail sentences, ridiculous insurrection and treason allegations -- all politically motivated of course - and S-tier hypocrisy from one side of the aisle about weaponization of the justice system when it's the very thing THEY are doing and no one else.
 
Last edited:
Irving Cowboy said:
I don't know if anyone in Manhattan was charged or not, honestly. Obviously, if what is being said is true, people involved should have been wearing cuffs.

The point was, GK's description above accurately described the people and events on January 6.

Does this satisfy your begging for someone to please argue with you?
Click to expand...


I said "professional agitators". That in no way describes January 6th.

I'm clearly talking about protestors that are paid to agitate.

"Professional agitators".

That was never the intention behind the first amendment's protection to peaceably assemble.

Mass organization and payment for protests manufactures a fake illusion of outrage that doesn't actually exist in fact.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom