- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 53,046
The vast majority of superbowl winning QBs were 35 or under. So it must not help too much.It helps.
The vast majority of superbowl winning QBs were 35 or under. So it must not help too much.It helps.
Yep. I seem to remember last years winner as being just a whelp.The vast majority of superbowl winning QBs were 35 or under. So it must not help too much.
Oh, you mean the guy that their HC told not to throw it any more because they were concerned about giving away the game?Yep. I seem to remember last years winner as being just a whelp.
How about the year before that?Oh, you mean the guy that their HC told not to throw it any more because they were concerned about giving away the game?
Poor example.
Of course. Everything that doesn't align with your thought process is a poor example. I am not anti Dak get that straight. I just dont get all the venal expressions regarding Romo. Its like grade school circles. You can have only one buddy and everyone else is to be hated.Oh, you mean the guy that their HC told not to throw it any more because they were concerned about giving away the game?
Poor example.
So now you're going to compare Romo to Brady? Yeah, he's totally in the same league as the guy that is 22-9 in the playoffs.How about the year before that?
2-4. That's really all that needs to be said.Of course. Everything that doesn't align with your thought process is a poor example. I am not anti Dak get that straight. I just dont get all the venal expressions regarding Romo. Its like grade school circles. You can have only one buddy and everyone else is to be hated.
There is an exception to every rule. But if experience was the over riding factor you would think 36 + year old QBs in the superbowl would be the norm.Yep. I seem to remember last years winner as being just a whelp.
I believe you are taking liberties now. I didn't even come close to saying 36 year olders are the norm with anything. In fact you brought up that topic and I gave your an example. There are enough posters on the site already who get creative with peoples words I would hate to see you succumb to that approach.There is an exception to every rule. But if experience was the over riding factor you would think 36 + year old QBs in the superbowl would be the norm.
A rookie QB in the superbowl is unheard of but so was a 39 year old winning it until last year.
Nope didn't intend to imply you said that. Was simply pointing out that there isn't a strong correlation between years of experience in this league and playoff success. Otherwise the older the QB the more likely they would be to win a Superbowl.I believe you are taking liberties now. I didn't even come close to saying 36 year olders are the norm with anything. In fact you brought up that topic and I gave your an example. There are enough posters on the site already who get creative with peoples words I would hate to see you succumb to that approach.
How does that align with zero. When there is even one that will be just fine with me regardless of who is at the helm.2-4. That's really all that needs to be said.
Time for a new era that doesn't include one of playoff failure after playoff failure.
I think there are just a lot of guys who are tired of the Romo roller coaster. Count me as one of them. Just too much up and down play.Of course. Everything that doesn't align with your thought process is a poor example. I am not anti Dak get that straight. I just dont get all the venal expressions regarding Romo. Its like grade school circles. You can have only one buddy and everyone else is to be hated.
Experience is experience whether it is with a 26 year old or a 40 year old. It is valuable in both instances. Experience doesn't always entail age however it is true that age will usuallly relate more experience. Even some experience is generally better than none. It isn't something that can just be disregarded.Nope didn't intend to imply you said that. Was simply pointing out that there isn't a strong correlation between years of experience in this league and playoff success. Otherwise the older the QB the more likely they would be to win a Superbowl.
I love the kid as well. I just happen to have a pretty high regard for Romo's skills as well.I think there are just a lot of guys who are tired of the Romo roller coaster. Count me as one of them. Just too much up and down play.
I honestly didnt believe I'd see another Aikman or Staubach in my lifetime- especially with the way Jones has drafted and ran this team. Meaning, trusting him to find another QB that just has "it".
Dak seems to have "it". Maybe its a fad..maybe its luck...maybe it comes crashing down soon. But damn its fun now.
That's where I am coming from as well.I said that we should stick with Dak for now and I'm not backing off of that.
That being said, can we please stop pretending Romo is some mediocre QB who isn't worthy of carrying Dak's jock?
It's getting ridiculous.
I can only speak for me....I know for a fact Romo is a really good QB. But I just look at the injury history, his big game history, and his age and I realize the chances of him taking us to a SB are pretty slim.I said that we should stick with Dak for now and I'm not backing off of that.
That being said, can we please stop pretending Romo is some mediocre QB who isn't worthy of carrying Dak's jock?
It's getting ridiculous.
I can't take issue with that. Dak is the future. Only time will tell whether Romo has any future with Dallas but my guess is that will unfold even as early as before the end of the season.I can only speak for me....I know for a fact Romo is a really good QB. But I just look at the injury history, his big game history, and his age and I realize the chances of him taking us to a SB are pretty slim.
I just prefer to ride Dak and see if he is the guy. If not, then you still have to plan for the future. Romo isn't the future.
My question is why wait for the future? We've seen what Romo has done and quite honestly I refuse to accept that as being an acceptable performance come playoff time.I can only speak for me....I know for a fact Romo is a really good QB. But I just look at the injury history, his big game history, and his age and I realize the chances of him taking us to a SB are pretty slim.
I just prefer to ride Dak and see if he is the guy. If not, then you still have to plan for the future. Romo isn't the future.