The President is allowed to go from point A to point B safely. Was the Secret Service supposed to let him wade through thousands of protesters who hate his guts? That'd be insane. When you're ordered to disperse and you don't, this is what happens. Try not to turn a little pepper spray into Kent State part II.
I think he should have stayed in the White House. There was no need for that photo op and assaulting protestors is not justified. If that was Obama ordering that against tea-party protestors, he would have been looking at impeachment and you would have been incensed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_McVeigh
We're going all the way back to McVeigh, huh? I guess that means I can cite Lee Harvey Oswald. Much more recent examples of political violence would involve Rep. Scalise and Sen. Rand, but I guess that wouldn't fit your narrative.
Actually it would fit my narrative just fine if you had read it. I said the issue is on both sides. Oh wait, you didn't quote that part because it didn't fit the straw man fight you're trying to wage.
I brought up McVeigh because he blew up a building, it was the biggest act of domestic terrorism in US history, and it utterly demolished your argument.
Who's been more publicly violent in recent years? The Klan or media favorite Antifa?
[/QUOTE]
The Klan is virtually dead but a host of other dumbass groups made up of losers have sprouted up. Again, we can compare lists but it doesn't take away from the fact that there are issues on both sides. Again, I reiterate that the extremists have more in common with each other than they do the moderates.
Also, the RWM talks about Antifa WAY more than MSM does. They've made them some sort of boogeyman. I've never met one, I don't know them. Hell, my brother (lives in Chicago lol) is a Bernie-backing, AOC fan and he doesn't know any antifa and thinks they are assholes that step on the message as well.