Irvin pulled from Super Bowl coverage

ravidubey

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
20,214
Lame as shit. For literally nothing.
They are all probably tired of Irvin’s game in the studio and are looking to bring in some new bliss anyway.

You can see by how no one is standing up for him. They try to present like they have chemistry in that studio with their wolf calls and bullshit, but Irvin is they only non-mercenary in there.
 

Foobio

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 10, 2013
Messages
3,621
Well, as great as he was as a player. And he was incredible.

How many times can you damage your brand?

gonna find out
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,819
They are all probably tired of Irvin’s game in the studio and are looking to bring in some new bliss anyway.

You can see by how no one is standing up for him. They try to present like they have chemistry in that studio with their wolf calls and bullshit, but Irvin is they only non-mercenary in there.
I don't know but he is entertaining unlike some.
 

bbgun

please don't "dur" me
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
23,529
ESPN doesn't need him for diversity purposes and he has "priors," so he's as good as gone.
 

ravidubey

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
20,214
No one is standing up for him because they are afraid.
True, but all it would take is a single “in all the years I’ve worked with and known Michael Irvin, he’s been a passionate, standup guy and represented us well in every setting”

Can’t get sued or receive backlash for that

But no one’s saying it. Not a peep

Of course, there were earlier accusations against Irvin (and Eric Davis) from in the late 2010’s I thought
 
Top Bottom