data
Forbes #1
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 50,468
Used condomNot a big fan of sweets.
Try again.
Used condomNot a big fan of sweets.
Try again.
Used condom
Slightly is like saying the Titanic almost sank.I think our negotiating tactics differ slightly.
Sure and you act like Randle is blind or something.It is not that simple. The guy running the ball has to recognize those yards and get them. I swear, people think DLs just fall down in fear at our OL.
That didn't happen in the 1990s and it isn't happening now.
I give you the cheap shot opportunity to slam another poster. Honorable, you are.Slightly is like saying the Titanic almost sank.
I give you the cheap shot opportunity to slam another poster. Honorable, you are.
~golf clap~
It's an abomination of the HOF.No shit. Players like tinglehoff wait decades and Bettis goes in <5 yrs.
I thought I read/heard that they were looking for bigger DBs and that was one of the reasons that they wanted to move on from Boykins.
Dumb philosophy, IMO. If a guy can play I keep him around regardless of his size.
Take his money first then tell him that.Pretty sure that's not possible.
Randle can squeeze through quickly in small seams. His biggest problem with the goal line will be having patience to find the crack. His gets to the line really fast.Sure and you act like Randle is blind or something.
you can go a long way in college on that idea but you run into some Darrell Green in the pros."We want taller, longer people because bigger people beat up little people," Kelly said.
It's basically just being lazy. Instead of actually seeing how a guy plays you just automatically go with the bigger guys.you can go a long way in college on that idea but you run into some Darrell Green in the pros.