Dude, have you paid attention to the media at all over the last 10 years?
Actually no I haven't. Having dipped my toe into the waters of media & political insanity the last few months, I realize how glorious my blissful ignorance was and I miss it
I was asking how it would hurt them in response to this statement:
The only thing the public (media) will do is hurt them if they present it early to the public.
IIUC, you're claiming the media would ignore anything they made public so it would neither help or hurt them because it would simply be ignored. There are forums where this evidence could be made available to folks who genuinely would like to know what evidence they have for the case they plan to make and I would like to see that made public ASAP.
I also believe people who are reasonable from all sides as well as those already on their side would like to see their evidence as well.
I'm not trying to argue with you or play gotcha amigo, I just honestly fail to see any downside to disclosing strong evidence, if they have it. Time is of the essence, as I said before, Shit or get off the pot.
At this point, I'm leaning toward they dont have and maybe never will overwhelming evidence to prove their case and if so, all this appears to be unnecessary grandstanding which will probably hurt the Republican Party more than anyone else