Democrat Presidential Nominees

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,352
 

Smitty

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
22,585

Jesus Christ, he says some of the looniest shit. Trump is now a socialist? My god, do they really think the voting public is that stupid? Oh, wait...
I think he's implying that many of the "socialist" policies he wants to implement are already implemented, or similar policies are implemented.

For what it's worth, I think of Bernie somewhat like I think of Ron Paul. Part of me wonders if I wouldn't get some of the things I like by the mere fact that, a) Bernie is relatively honest (compared to the rest of them), b) does want what's best for the "working class," against huge corporatism, and c) if by the fact that he's SO far to the left, he's come around full circle to touch on some of the things that the far right would want.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,352
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,352
Oof, kind of an unfair characterization of what he was saying. He was saying he doesn't care if insurance companies fail, not that he doesn't care if 150 million people lose their health insurance.
If the companies fail, the individual would have two choices. Go with his public healthcare nonsense or go without. I think it's a fair characterization.
 

Chocolate Lab

Mere Commoner
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Messages
20,371
Part of me wonders if I wouldn't get some of the things I like by the mere fact that, a) Bernie is relatively honest (compared to the rest of them), b) does want what's best for the "working class," against huge corporatism, and c) if by the fact that he's SO far to the left, he's come around full circle to touch on some of the things that the far right would want.
:wtf
 

jsmith6919

Honored Member - RIP
Joined
Aug 26, 2013
Messages
28,407
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
37,993
If the companies fail, the individual would have two choices. Go with his public healthcare nonsense or go without. I think it's a fair characterization.
I agree with your premise that he wants to coerce people into a public healthcare system and this would be a bad result, but that's different than the implication that he's saying he doesn't care if 150 million people lose their health insurance.

He's literally saying he doesn't care if insurance companies fail, but he isn't assuming that 150 million people would lose their health insurance he's assuming all those people would likely turn to his public system. It's stated awkwardly for sure. I just don't want to mischaracterize what's being said here, because it's the idea that's problematic not the statement.
 

NoDak

Hotlinking' sonofabitch
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
23,310
I agree with your premise that he wants to coerce people into a public healthcare system and this would be a bad result, but that's different than the implication that he's saying he doesn't care if 150 million people lose their health insurance.

He's literally saying he doesn't care if insurance companies fail, but he isn't assuming that 150 million people would lose their health insurance he's assuming all those people would likely turn to his public system. It's stated awkwardly for sure. I just don't want to mischaracterize what's being said here, because it's the idea that's problematic not the statement.
I agree. As a conservative, I absolutely hate when libs twist things to fit their narrative, taking things out of context, and only presenting half the story to the public. We shouldn't do the same thing just because it fits OUR agenda this time.
 

jsmith6919

Honored Member - RIP
Joined
Aug 26, 2013
Messages
28,407
I agree. As a conservative, I absolutely hate when libs twist things to fit their narrative, taking things out of context, and only presenting half the story to the public. We shouldn't do the same thing just because it fits OUR agenda this time.
Yea, their policies are bad enough as is, no need to embellish
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
53,204
I agree with your premise that he wants to coerce people into a public healthcare system and this would be a bad result, but that's different than the implication that he's saying he doesn't care if 150 million people lose their health insurance.

He's literally saying he doesn't care if insurance companies fail, but he isn't assuming that 150 million people would lose their health insurance he's assuming all those people would likely turn to his public system. It's stated awkwardly for sure. I just don't want to mischaracterize what's being said here, because it's the idea that's problematic not the statement.
I don't know what his plan is so I have a hard time arguing it. If he is going to create government insurance that isn't tax funded awesome. If it's so good it puts private companies out of business so be it.

But if his plan is to tax everyone to fund his health care plan that's different. A private company can't fairly compete without a level playing field. In the end we all end up with worse insurance and less money. And then his arrogance is a prick statement.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,352
If he is going to create government insurance that isn't tax funded
How would one do that exactly, though? If it's run by the government, it would be funded by the tax payers, no?
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
53,204
How would one do that exactly, though? If it's run by the government, it would be funded by the tax payers, no?
By making it elective and having the people who sign up for government health insurance fund it. Most politicians will tell you this is impossible to do without tax dollars but it's possible hypothetically. Government insurance wouldn't need the big advertising budget, they would have great negotiating power and presumably wouldn't be concerned with turning any profit at all. But essentially a private insurance company could still compete against them.

That's different than saying everyone above a certain wage has to pay for government health insurance through taxes and then everyone gets it. And of course you can still keep your old policy but no private insurance company can compete with that. People would be forced to give up their old insurance because there would be no logic behind paying for both. And people who can't afford insurance wouldn't pay for the private policy anyway, they will just take the free health care and move on.

Politicians always think this stuff is easy but it's really not. Health care is extremely complex. And if you want to give everyone free health care, costs are going to go up because if people aren't going to have to pay for it they will go to the doctor every time someone gets a common cold. Which drives up costs and suddenly we need more tax dollars. Not to mention everything government run seems to cost twice as much as it should because they don't have to compete. It's no different than a monopoly that doesn't have to worry about competition. People will just start lining their pockets and not give a shit about the healthcare system itself. Which I'm guessing is really what he is proposing but like I said, I don't know any specifics about his proposal so I'll try not to be offended until I do.
 

Chocolate Lab

Mere Commoner
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Messages
20,371
By making it elective and having the people who sign up for government health insurance fund it.
But the people who don't have it either can't or don't want to fund it. That's why we all have to.

Also, what absolute bullshit for Elizabeth Warren to use Mississippi flooding as an example of climate change. :doh Even they can't possibly believe this.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,352
But the people who don't have it either can't or don't want to fund it. That's why we all have to.

Also, what absolute bullshit for Elizabeth Warren to use Mississippi flooding as an example of climate change. :doh Even they can't possibly believe this.
Hell, they blame all hurricanes on climate change. Yes, seriously.
 
Top Bottom