- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 52,977
If we are adding someone I have a hard time finding a better RB that would be available.Wait, so we should sign Bradshaw now?
Just trying to catch up.
If we are adding someone I have a hard time finding a better RB that would be available.Wait, so we should sign Bradshaw now?
Just trying to catch up.
Kevin Smith.If we are adding someone I have a hard time finding a better RB that would be available.
Doug. Martin.Bradshaw hasn't had so much as 100 carries in 3 years. I don't think he's a good option.
Martin has been injured but I don't think he's run down like McFadden probably is.Martin has played 17 games in 2 years and averaged 3.7 ypc. I don't see much difference from McFadden. Feh.
Umm yes he has. His last three years are:Bradshaw hasn't had so much as 100 carries in 3 years. I don't think he's a good option.
In a single season he has not had 100 carries since 2012. 3 years. I can't imagine why that would be useful to us.Umm yes he has. His last three years are:
2012 - 221 Carries 1,015 yards
2013 - 41 Carries 186 yards
2014 - 90 Carries 425 yards
So yes, within the last 3 years he has had well over 100 carries. If the Colts didn't screw around with the draft bust last year he would have gone well over that as well this past season.
Martin hasn't been good overall even when healthy.Martin has been injured but I don't think he's run down like McFadden probably is.
Umm 2012 is within 3 years... You do know it's only 2015 right now.In a single season he has not had 100 carries since 2012. 3 years. I can't imagine why that would be useful to us.
Semantics. It was 3 years ago. My point remains. He hasn't been reliable in a long time. Pass.Umm 2012 is within 3 years... You do know it's only 2015 right now.
I guess since you included a period its settled then.Doug. Martin.
but it wasn't 3 years ago. It was less. This isn't semantics, its math.Semantics. It was 3 years ago. My point remains. He hasn't been reliable in a long time. Pass.
No, it's semantics. And frankly, it pisses me off that you are making me play this stupid fucking game because you have a hard on for an unreliable player and because you are apparently incapable of arguing the point on its merits.but it wasn't 3 years ago. It was less. This isn't semantics, its math.
He had one really injury riddled season in 2013. But when he has been healthy we are talking about a RB who has averaged between 4.5 and 5 YPC basically every season. Which is exactly what we need.
It only pisses you off because you're wrong. 3 years ago is May 5, 2012. Therefore the entire 2012 season is within 3 years. Not sure why you're trying to argue this point. You're wrong. Admit it and move on.No, it's semantics. And frankly, it pisses me off that you are making me play this stupid fucking game because you have a hard on for an unreliable player and because you are apparently incapable of arguing the point on its merits.
Did he have 100 carries last year? No. That's 1 year. Did he have 100 carries in 2013? No. That's 2 years. Did he have 100 carries in 2012? Yes. That's 3 years ago. Maybe use your fingers next time.
Actually artificially inflating numbers to support your argument is way more like Schmitty.and it pisses me off, not because I'm wrong, but because you're so butthurt that I called out an unreliable player that you're in love with, that you're arguing over something that has nothing to do with either of our actual points. Smitty style.