Jesus Christ, you said give something tangible that supports that Elliott is the superior back. I used stats just like you are trying to do and the stats came back undoubtedly in the corner of Elliott being the superior back and now you are backpedaling. The numbers don’t lie. And numbers over multiple seasons is a WAY better indicator of talent than just one single season.
Thanks for the info but what the numbers say is that in a 3 year averaging of Elliot stats and in 4year averaging of Murray the averaging in in Elliot’s favor but it cannot reconcile what the stats for Murray would have been had he been able to play in the same number of games in a like season but let me repeat,
I never set out to prove That Murray was the superior back of the two. What I stated from the start was that I am not convinced that Elliot could accomplish in a single season what Murray did and I wasn’t sure Elliot was superior. That’s my opinion and it’s what I stated from the start. Rather everyone is tryin to say I think Murray is superior and their response is to tell me they disagree with what I didn’t say in the first place. Why can’t folks just read and respond to what I said and not get in a fighting mode.
If some wants to think that Elliot is the better that’s fine your are entitled to an opinion. If someone wants to produce evidence as to why they think Elliot is superior that’s fine also but it’s a total different matter than telling me I am wrong about Murray being superior when I haven’t taken that position and then try to brow beat me with an argument that’s is aimed at showing me I am all wet.
Just allow me to think I am not certain Elliot could hold up under Murray’s record season and because of that I am not certain now that Elliot is superior. As previously stated if Elliot happens to accomplish this feat I will reconsider my position. I hope I have made myself clear.
