- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 120,216
It's fucking annoying as hell. Cowboys Rool! Haters Drool!Pretty much. But, you know... wave your pom-poms and act pretentious and all that.
It's fucking annoying as hell. Cowboys Rool! Haters Drool!Pretty much. But, you know... wave your pom-poms and act pretentious and all that.
Absolutely. These are all backs I was interested in.Off the top of my head I'd take Cobb, Jones, or Langford and we could have moved up a couple and got Coleman, Duke Johnson, or David Johnson
Grrrr and stuff.
Grrrr and all that.
It's fucking annoying as hell. Cowboys Rool! Haters Drool!
Just because you would take them does not make them better especially considering Dunbar knows the offense and plays all special teams.Off the top of my head I'd take Cobb, Jones, or Langford and we could have moved up a couple and got Coleman, Duke Johnson, or David Johnson
He was injury prone at Miami and guess what?duke johnson will be a nice back in this league
I could understand you putting up Randle or even DMac but are you really saying coaches pet Dunbar is better than any of themJust because you would take them does not make them better especially considering Dunbar knows the offense and plays all special teams.
The bigger problem is that a nobody like Dunbar has been permitted to write his own scholarship to the team simply by ingratiating himself to a bad special teams coach. I don't even think the offensive coaches are as enamored with him as they lead on.I could understand you putting up Randle or even DMac but are you really saying coaches pet Dunbar is better than any of them
Well then the ST's coach has way too much power if his pet is affecting the roster especially at rb on a supposed running teamThe bigger problem is that a nobody like Dunbar has been permitted to write his own scholarship to the team simply by ingratiating himself to a bad special teams coach. I don't even think the offensive coaches are as enamored with him as they lead on.
Maybe you'd have found a RB better than Dunbar in the 3rd-7th but I wouldn't have wanted to sacrifice Damien Wilson or Ryan Russell to get a Lance Dunbar replacement. I'm looking for a lead back, not another guy who will get stuck behind Randle and McFadden.History has shown that there will be some productive backs out of the draft class in rounds 3-7. It's way too early to just assume that the Cowboys couldn't have done better.
Especially when you consider that we already had 7 years of tape on McFadden's worthless ass and 3 years of Dunbar.
I'd bet a months pay that a RB drafted between rounds 3-6 will be better than McFadden and Dunbar.
I notice you don't hear Jay Ajayi's name anymore.He was injury prone at Miami and guess what?
he has been injured all camp.
And he was a favorite of mine coming out.
He's got work to do as a blocker, but he flashed his talent and now has a cracked rib. Yeah, I'd take him over Dunbar. Hell, I would take a lot of backs over Dunbar.I notice you don't hear Jay Ajayi's name anymore.
I don't think anyone is debating that we have no use for Dunbar.He's got work to do as a blocker, but he flashed his talent and now has a cracked rib. Yeah, I'd take him over Dunbar. Hell, I would take a lot of backs over Dunbar.
Sherman Williams averaged 4.3 in 1995.I think coaches are putting way too much faith in our OL to create holes for our marginal RBs. The fan base as well. Several people just assume we'll be fine because of the OL talent.
As I've said several times, I think we're going to struggle running the ball in short yardage situations. The run game won't be as consistent as it was last year.
Think about this. The early 90s Cowboys OL is considered one top 2 or 3 OLs of All-Time. Yet when RBs other than Emmitt carried the ball they couldn't even scratch out 4 ypc.
That's because despite what some may think, in order to have a consistent and effective running game you need talent at the RB position; even with a strong OL. This notion that the Cowboys will be fine with a backfield full of bums is silly.
Chicken dinner.I think coaches are putting way too much faith in our OL to create holes for our marginal RBs. The fan base as well. Several people just assume we'll be fine because of the OL talent.
As I've said several times, I think we're going to struggle running the ball in short yardage situations. The run game won't be as consistent as it was last year.
Think about this. The early 90s Cowboys OL is considered one top 2 or 3 OLs of All-Time. Yet when RBs other than Emmitt carried the ball they couldn't even scratch out 4 ypc.
That's because despite what some may think, in order to have a consistent and effective running game you need talent at the RB position; even with a strong OL. This notion that the Cowboys will be fine with a backfield full of bums is silly.
Couldn't have said it better. That OL needed Emmitt.I think coaches are putting way too much faith in our OL to create holes for our marginal RBs. The fan base as well. Several people just assume we'll be fine because of the OL talent.
As I've said several times, I think we're going to struggle running the ball in short yardage situations. The run game won't be as consistent as it was last year.
Think about this. The early 90s Cowboys OL is considered one top 2 or 3 OLs of All-Time. Yet when RBs other than Emmitt carried the ball they couldn't even scratch out 4 ypc.
That's because despite what some may think, in order to have a consistent and effective running game you need talent at the RB position; even with a strong OL. This notion that the Cowboys will be fine with a backfield full of bums is silly.
Fair enough. But that was one year out of our dominant OL era.Sherman Williams averaged 4.3 in 1995.
Did you miss the part about special teams play?I could understand you putting up Randle or even DMac but are you really saying coaches pet Dunbar is better than any of them
This.Maybe you'd have found a RB better than Dunbar in the 3rd-7th but I wouldn't have wanted to sacrifice Damien Wilson or Ryan Russell to get a Lance Dunbar replacement. I'm looking for a lead back, not another guy who will get stuck behind Randle and McFadden.
I'm not saying you are wrong, but it looks like we might have gotten some good players in this draft. The only way we find a sure-fire upgrade is probably by not selecting Gregory in the 2nd, and I'm not going to make that trade-off.
I think the ONLY pick you can really say that might have been a mistake instead of locking in on Best Available Running Back was Chaz Green -- but at the time we didn't know we'd be landing Collins either.
Hard for me to say they "ignored RB all offseason" when they added the only FA they could really afford (given Dez's situation at the time), and maybe missed on ONE draft slot where they could have gotten an instant contributor.
The opportunities were not really all over the place. The few opportunities they had, I think they did better by NOT taking a RB.
I think we have talent at RB, you happen to think otherwise.I think coaches are putting way too much faith in our OL to create holes for our marginal RBs. The fan base as well. Several people just assume we'll be fine because of the OL talent.
As I've said several times, I think we're going to struggle running the ball in short yardage situations. The run game won't be as consistent as it was last year.
Think about this. The early 90s Cowboys OL is considered one top 2 or 3 OLs of All-Time. Yet when RBs other than Emmitt carried the ball they couldn't even scratch out 4 ypc.
That's because despite what some may think, in order to have a consistent and effective running game you need talent at the RB position; even with a strong OL. This notion that the Cowboys will be fine with a backfield full of bums is silly.