people saying a running back sucks who
sucks so bad he is out of the league at 25 are being emotional and not logical.
Not the guy who is defending him tooth and nail just so he doesn't have to admit he was wrong about him.
That's funny.
As for the Atlanta game, if you want to play your little semantics game again and pretend that the difference between 3 good runs or 4 good runs or whatever somehow defeats the entire premise that randle had way more bad runs than good in that game (and his pathetic 3 years and done career), go right ahead but you are a fool for doing so.
And you are a fool for defending randle tooth and nail. He's a latter day
troy hambrick. Dude. Can't. Play. Why in the world would you hitch your wagon to randle of all people?
I can only assume you simply don't know
shit about running backs. Or can't admit when you are wrong.
Jesus
fucking christ.