BipolarFuk
Demoted
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 11,464
Tyrone Crawford is a question mark. No one knows if he is a legitimate player or just another spare.
Care to actually bring something to the discussion to actually demonstrate your position? Because to this point, you've said nothing.
Could you explain the power structure in the Cowboy's F.O. for us football novices? Who does what? Who has what responsibilities?
Maybe you could do a football 101 thread.
....and you?I'll just take your word on it. What position do you hold in the Cowboys organization that you would be able to speak to this directly?
I wouldn't call him a complete question mark. As a rookie he had earned considerable playing time in the second half of the season. He ability and position flexibility to play multiple positions along the DL.Tyrone Crawford is a question mark. No one knows if he is a legitimate player or just another spare.
I think you're just being foolish to say that about Wilber. 44 tackles, 2 sacks, 1 forced fumble, 2 fumble recoveries and 3 tackles for loss. I would say that is a pretty damn good stat line for a guy who was a part time player last year. I think there is plenty of reason for optimism based on the way he played last year. To say otherwise in my opinion is to just try and be a sour puss.Tyrone Crawford and Kyle Wilbur have done nothing to make it anything more than retarded optimism yo think they can be valuable contributors ob a good defense.
And you have? The only thing you've done is regurgitate mindless drivel spouted by our retarded coach and F.O.Because to this point, you've said nothing.
So you guys have nothing to bring to the table. I have several replies with my logic yet all I seem to get from you is "oh yeah" or unilateral statements with no backup.....and you?
He earned time as a rookie in a different scheme. We have no idea if he can be a contributor in this defense.I wouldn't call him a complete question mark. As a rookie he had earned considerable playing time in the second half of the season. He ability and position flexibility to play multiple positions along the DL.
The injury in training camp last year was very unfortunate on a year where better things were expected from him.
Sorry, I make my statements based on the actions I see. I take NO ONE'S word for anything. Not owners, GMs, coaches, players or board posters.And you have? The only thing you've done is regurgitate mindless drivel spouted by our retarded coach and F.O.
It fits you.
Maybe, so we have potential in 2 players at SLB? I'd say that is a good thing, especially if both develop.I think Holloman has more upside at LB than Wilbur.
No it doesn't. But my original statement was that they were following the plan.2 good players does not a rebuild make.
I like Holloman as well. I don't think he necessarily plays disciplined yet but that will come with time. The guy can definitely run around and make plays though. I think he should get some consideration for the WLB spot.I think Holloman has more upside at LB than Wilbur.
1. There are no more old players to sign. Attrition has taken care of that.Ahhh the standard answer for someone who doesn't really have anything to bring to the table. Site me specific evidence that supports the fact that there is no plan.
Evidence that there is a plan (over the last three years).
1. They have stopped paying older players to long overpriced contracts that they will outlive and end up being cut to put large dead money on future years. (I know you will point to Romo, but when you have a QB playing well, you have to pay him. He can still be cut in two seasons with a net $9M gain to the salary cap).
2. Over the last two years, they dead money has gone down each year.
3. They have rebuilt the OL (which was horrible) through the draft.
Tyrone Crawford is probably a career backup, FWIW.Tyron Crawford and Travis Frederick aren't better talent?
Come on, take your "everything sucks" blinders off.
I'm not saying the team is going to take the NFL by storm, but at least that some things have gotten better.
You are making me so proud right now.2 good players does not a rebuild make.
I do too, but I'm more inclined to at least give Wilbur a shot at OLB than I would be on the DL. He sucks there, he's not a fit at all.I think Holloman has more upside at LB than Wilbur.
If they simply add Melton and then build the D-line through the draft that would be perfect. You're not going to get stud starting D-lineman at this point. There isn't anything wrong with that plan. It's the right thing to do. The problem is we need another very strong draft in order to accomplish that.Sadly, my guess is the plan is to add Mincey and McClain, Melton or Hatcher if they can, nobody else if they can't, then draft a DL or two and return Crawford and Bass to the Selvie/Hayden mix.
Seems like a shitty ass plan to me.
Wilber can rush the passer as a DE but he is horrendous against the run. I think he should be used as a SLB who can also rush the passer.I do too, but I'm more inclined to at least give Wilbur a shot at OLB than I would be on the DL. He sucks there, he's not a fit at all.
Maybe he can be the SAM backer. Or at least chip in at that position.