We were 30th in YPC and dead last in rushing TDs scored against. Mazi has a 34.8 PFF rating, 207th out of 219 D-Linemen. Say what you will about PFF grades, but that's damning.
Also it's granted that one man does not represent an entire run defense, but it's one of his most important duties on this team and we're clearly failing. I can't pretend he's anywhere close to what we need.
We could replace him with "any one of 206 other DL". Right now he's the very definition of a progress stopper and underperformer in a role where we simply can't have that. Average would be a major step up.
I don't know if the Joneses are ready to give up and f'ing allow others to compete with Smith straight up. I think they've named him the starter and there's a good chance they could get stubborn about it.
I get it, on paper it looks bad, but I think his individual performance (and the defense as a whole) was skewed by how horrific they were over the first 6 or so games of the year when the entire defense was completely out of sorts and historically bad.
They regularly gave up 200+ rushing yards and 450+ total yards over the first 6 games of the year but I think the entire defense, and the run defense in particular really started to turn a corner around the time of the Atlanta game. It's not a coincidence that some of our top defensive players started coming back around that time also.
Just looking at the rushing stats this is what they did from the Atlanta game onward, with Mazi playing a large % of snaps, larger than he really should be playing this year:
- Atlanta: 30/100 total (3.3 YPC), leading rusher was Bijan Robinson at 19/86 (4.5 YPC)
- Philly: 38/187 (4.9 YPC - but Hurts had 7/56, take that out and they only gave up 4.2 YPC), Barkley had 14/66 (4.7 YPC)
- Houston: 25/141 (5.6 YPC), Mixon had 20/109 (5.4 YPC)
- Washington: 25/145 (5.8 YPC - but Daniels had 7/74, take that out and it's only 18/71 for a 3.9 YPC), their leading rushing RB was Ekeler at 9/22
- Giants: 21/116 (5.5 YPC - somehow Drew Lock ran for 4/57, take that out and they only put up 17/59 for 3.4 YPC), their leading rushing RB was Tyrone Tracy at 9/32
- Bengals: 19/74 (3.9 YPC), Chase Brown had 14/58 (4.1 YPC)
- Carolina: 16/60 (3.75 YPC), Chuba Hubbard had 10/32
- Bucs: 23/134 (5.8 YPC - Baker had 3/42, take that out and they only had 20/91 for 4.5 YPC), Bucky Irving had 16/68 (4.3 YPC)
- Eagles: 42/179 (4.3 YPC), Barkley had 31/167, but in the first half he only had 13/40, the stats look out of control because they were letting him stat pad to get to 2,000 in the second half when the game was over at halftime
- Washington: 18/113 (6.3 YPC, but their two QB's had 9/83 rushing, take that out and their RB's only had 9/30 rushing)
So we faced four of the top 10 rushers in the league over that stretch (five if you want to count Barkley twice) and only gave up: 19/86, 14/66, 10/32, 16/68 and a very, very skewed 31/167. That's consistently only giving up around 4.3-4.5 YPC and less than 100 yards against elite RB's except for the one outlier Barkley game where he was under control in the first half and stat padding in the second after we were down 24-7 at halftime.
It's hard for me to blame Mazi for QB's running on us when often times that's coming on scrambles in passing situations when he isn't even on the field. Take out the QB rushing stats and we were regularly holding teams to right around 4 YPC or less, and again, often times against teams with RB's who ended up top 10 in the league in rushing.
Of course I don't aspire for our run defense to only hold teams to 4.5 YPC, but my point is that the run defense was generally respectable over the second half of the season with Mazi being the starting NT.