Chocolate Lab
Kuato Lives
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2014
- Messages
- 28,226
Dude. It might be time to seek help.Same way Melania got a visa?
Dude. It might be time to seek help.Same way Melania got a visa?
Same way Melania got a visa?
He is sitting on a very bad Combine workout.
According to who? Tv pundits who hate his guts? Of course they were loooking for an opportunity to lay the bar on the ground and see if Harris could step over it instead of trip.
He is sitting on a very bad Combine workout.
You know this is my biggest problem with the debate. It felt at times like Trump had to debate the moderators and Harris. A debate should be one on one. IF Harris calls Trump out on his bullshit, that's fair game. Just like Trump should call Harris out on her bullshit. But to have moderators prepared to basically say, hey what you're saying isn't true, seems a bit unfair. Especially when this thing is supposed to be unscripted. So the moderators are just prepared with these things ahead of time? Without knowing what's going to be said? Or is the moderator just giving their opinion too? Which also seems wildly inappropriate in a debate.Harris won’t agree to a debate where the moderators aren’t there to do the work for her.
Speaking of which Goldman Sachs completely walked back whatever Kamala was trying to brag about. They claimed it was some independent work that like one analyst did based on a total of like 4 policy issues between the two. And he said the difference in predicted GDP on those policies was so small it meant nothing.It doesn’t matter what policy wonks
Anyway, I'm all for checking the facts on things these two people say at a debate.
They were ready, and they executed exactly the way they meant to.But hey, those moderators weren't ready for that one.
But hey, those moderators weren't ready for that one.
Yup.I think people underestimate just how much America hates a cunt. Hillary is and was a cunt, Kamala is definitely a cunt.
I don't think I was clear with what I meant. What I meant was someone like myself looking at the things said after the debate, and deciding if they are true or not. To me, I'm all for that. What I'm not for is a moderator or network or website giving me some made up figure and claiming there were 16 lies on Trumps side verse 2 lies on Harris's side.I am not.
I'm all for treating people like adults and letting them decide for themselves what they agree with or believe.
Checking facts gives a very, very false impression that these news people are to be trusted with discerning fact from fiction, and nothing could be further from reality.
Ministry of truth, my brother.Case in point.
But when you have "fact checking" it gives people the false impression that if they don't debunk something it must be true. And that's simply not the case.
It also gives credence to the very very dangerous notion that censorship is ok, because things like checking facts and combating misinformation is more important.
That's a really bad road to be going down.
I don't think I was clear with what I meant. What I meant was someone like myself looking at the things said after the debate, and deciding if they are true or not. To me, I'm all for that. What I'm not for is a moderator or network or website giving me some made up figure and claiming there were 16 lies on Trumps side verse 2 lies on Harris's side.
I appreciate actual critical thinking by an individual who watches the debate. Again, I find myself doing it all the time with this political shit.
And here is the problem we face. People are willfully ignorant and just get spoonfed bullshit by the media and they just soak it up.Most people probably won't though.