- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 122,812
Pratt is the way.If Penix or Nix falls to the 2nd I'd roll the dice, might even talk myself into McCarthy in the 1st but would depend on the board. I'd roll the dice on the Tulane or FSU kid in the 4th.
Pratt is the way.If Penix or Nix falls to the 2nd I'd roll the dice, might even talk myself into McCarthy in the 1st but would depend on the board. I'd roll the dice on the Tulane or FSU kid in the 4th.
And this is why I disagree with the crowd that wants to make Parson's a LBer again. I think it's just silly.
Well, when his health is mangled in a few years, you might think differently.And this is why I disagree with the crowd that wants to make Parson's a LBer again. I think it's just silly.
He absolutely could play that role. The truth is any passing play where he is dropping into coverage is pretty much a wasted play for Parsons. He is a see ball, get ball kind of guy. Against the run and pass. Standing out there in coverage he is going to be pretty worthless until the ball is completed.He's the same size as Von Miller. I don't see why he couldn't be a weakside OLB in a 34.
Problem I see is too often we run this four man front with only two true DTs and basically two 34 OLBs playing end.
And this is why I disagree with the crowd that wants to make Parson's a LBer again. I think it's just silly.
He's the same size as Von Miller. I don't see why he couldn't be a weakside OLB in a 34.
Problem I see is too often we run this four man front with only two true DTs and basically two 34 OLBs playing end.
Well I do agree with that. It's why I say the term "full time LBer"I mean context matters.
He absolutely should be rushing on 3 and 9 in a must win playoff game.
That doesn't mean he needs to be rushing every down in a random September game.
The truth is any passing play where he is dropping into coverage is pretty much a wasted play for Parsons.
Not in pass coverage he didn't in college. I agree he is excellent against the run while off the ball. He is an excellent Blitzer while off the ball. I'm all for moving him around.That is absolutely untrue.
He is a very very good off the ball linebacker and made plays from that position both in college and his first year here when he did it more often.
Absolutely. How he lined up EVERYWHERE, even CB, his first year should be the blueprint how he is used.That is absolutely untrue.
He is a very very good off the ball linebacker and made plays from that position both in college and his first year here when he did it more often.