this I disagree with. This defense is good against shitty offenses. Just like Dak cant beat a good defense, this defense struggles against good (even mediocre) offenses.
I don't think this is really true. The SF offense is an elite offense and if we didn't hand them four turnovers they wouldn't have scored anywhere close to 42 points.
It's a very good defense, but allowing 20-24 points a game is par for the course even for very good defenses. It's not the 85 Bears or the 2000 Ravens, but then, only homers thought this defense was truly that good. DeMarcus Lawrence is too inconsistent at making an impact anymore, we have no LBs worth a damn, and the safeties all have warts. On top of that we are down a high end corner - a high end corner I certainly would have traded for a haul even in draft picks, but we have nothing in return for him right now. But it's still a very good defense.
Defenses rely on offenses to take the pressure off them, to control the clock a little.
Right now our offense is straight up bad. And it's kinda been obvious all season.
I'd like to blame McCarthy but I also know, unlike too many Cowboys fans, that Dak is crap. So we have to take that into account. We can't get rid of this bum fast enough. He was never really that good, always required elite pieces around him, and now he's in fast decline.
If we extend him we are morons.