Cujo
DCC 4Life
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 3,878
I fucking hate people so damn much. What could the motive have possibly been? 49ers fans that were pissed? I mean, I am honestly wondering.
One is wearing a Mahomes jersey.
I fucking hate people so damn much. What could the motive have possibly been? 49ers fans that were pissed? I mean, I am honestly wondering.
Good point. So, why? Just to be an evil motherfucker?One is wearing a Mahomes jersey.
Good point. So, why? Just to be an evil motherfucker?
Basically, he wasn't scared of Brock Purdy and not all that worried about their receivers either.
That is how everyone should have attacked them.
Absolute nonsense.He also had the disadvantage of going first in playoff overtime
Anyone dislike the playoff OT rules?
The fact there’s debate over coin toss winner better to receive or defer is a positive.
I used to feel this way but over the years I changed my mind. Mainly because the NFL has gone overboard with rules favoring the offense.I never thought there was anything wrong with sudden death either and I felt like way too many people were letting defenses off the hook -- it was as if defenses were no longer being held accountable for letting a team score all because it happened in overtime.
Agreed.I think you have to adjust and allow the other team at least one possession. After that all bets are off and it's sudden death.
I'm not trying to say Purdy is the next great QB at all, but you are at a disadvantage when you know you can settle for a FG vs being forced to score or be eliminated. In the latter case, you have 4th down available to you. That is an advantage. All I'm saying.Absolute nonsense.
I hate how people have just let teams off the hook for playing actual football just because it's overtime.
I never thought there was anything wrong with sudden death either and I felt like way too many people were letting defenses off the hook -- it was as if defenses were no longer being held accountable for letting a team score all because it happened in overtime.
But now both teams get a chance to get the ball and even then we're gonna let the 49ers off the hook for not scoring a TD as it was some of case of bad luck?
Bullshit.
They had their chance to win that Super Bowl and they came up short. Kansas City went right down the field on the very next drive and did so while converting a fourth down inside their own territory so I don't want to hear any such nonsense that someone lost that game for any other reason than they just didn't get the job done.
I agree with this.I'm not trying to say Purdy is the next great QB at all, but you are at a disadvantage when you know you can settle for a FG vs being forced to score or be eliminated. In the latter case, you have 4th down available to you. That is an advantage. All I'm saying.
You prefer sticking with the current regular season rules?I hate it.
Every Democrat: It’s clearly the gun manufacturer’s fault. Ban them all.Good point. So, why? Just to be an evil motherfucker?
I would not be surprised if it is erased.you mean it wasn't the Proud Boys??
I never thought there was anything wrong with sudden death either and I felt like way too many people were letting defenses off the hook -- it was as if defenses were no longer being held accountable for letting a team score all because it happened in overtime.
You prefer sticking with the current regular season rules?
Maybe, Simms played for a long time and didn't start out so hot. He was also an interception machine.Brock Purdy comp……….Phil Simms?
It is part of the game. It's still part of the game in overtime. Just a little more balanced so both teams actually have to play defense.Like Ace basically said, play defense. That's still part of the game, right?
Im fine with sudden death if first drive starts at the ~7 yard line.Sudden death was always fine. The disadvantage of losing the coin toss for OT was always way overexaggerated.
Like Ace basically said, play defense. That's still part of the game, right?