2023 Random Cowboys Stuff Thread

[p1_]

Yeah, I assumed Ferg and Hendershot were attached at the hips. He should be there too. Frankly Gallup needs to get his ass out there and put in some work too. His lazy ass route running was no helpful to our teams success. I'll give Lamb a pass because he actually looks great even though I'd love to see him and Dak continue building chemistry.

Gallup just had surgery.

 

[Cowboysrock55]

Gallup just had surgery.

Ah forgot that, that's fair. I expect him to be out there by June...

 

[p1_]

Ah forgot that, that's fair. I expect him to be out there by June...

that's his excuse for mediocre to poor play.

 

[boozeman]

So a second and Dorance Armstrong for Jeudy?

 

[p1_]

So a second and Dorance Armstrong for Jeudy?

thats a tough one.

 

[boozeman]

thats a tough one.

I think the Broncos would turn that down and want the two plus a quality player.

 

[Chocolate Lab]

So a second and Dorance Armstrong for Jeudy?

 

[boozeman]

 

[p1_]

yet again.

 

[Cowboysrock55]

So rescind it then. You can do that if Pollard hasn't signed the franchise tag.

 

[Simpleton]

$10M on a one year deal isn't that different from what someone like Sanders got and I'd rather have Pollard than Sanders. They knew they'd be releasing Elliott and couldn't risk losing Pollard too, they can always negotiate a 3-4 year deal based on what's going on in the market right now, or just let it roll with the franchise tag.

But losing Pollard isn't an option.

 

[p1_]

$10M on a one year deal isn't that different from what someone like Sanders got and I'd rather have Pollard than Sanders. They knew they'd be releasing Elliott and couldn't risk losing Pollard too, they can always negotiate a 3-4 year deal based on what's going on in the market right now, or just let it roll with the franchise tag.

But losing Pollard isn't an option.

I look at it that we need Pollard too, but 10 vs 6 is significant. I guess thats the tag-onomics we have to absorb.

 

[NoDak]

$10M on a one year deal isn't that different from what someone like Sanders got and I'd rather have Pollard than Sanders. They knew they'd be releasing Elliott and couldn't risk losing Pollard too, they can always negotiate a 3-4 year deal based on what's going on in the market right now, or just let it roll with the franchise tag.

But losing Pollard isn't an option.

Exactly.

But, you know…

 

[boozeman]

$10M on a one year deal isn't that different from what someone like Sanders got and I'd rather have Pollard than Sanders. They knew they'd be releasing Elliott and couldn't risk losing Pollard too, they can always negotiate a 3-4 year deal based on what's going on in the market right now, or just let it roll with the franchise tag.

But losing Pollard isn't an option.

Correct.

I just did not like the idea of franchising an injured player.

The market for backs ain't getting bigger.

Depending on what happens in the draft, he could get Schultz'ed.

 

[p1_]

3rd team in 2 years.

 

[p1_]

Browns must be desperate for Dline talent.

 

[boozeman]

3rd team in 2 years.

Another repost outside the official NFL Free Agency thread. INFRACTION!

 

[boozeman]

Browns must be desperate for Dline talent.

I will let you off with just a warning here.

 

[p1_]

I will let you off with just a warning here.

I didnt realize the player was so incendiary.

 

[boozeman]

Can anyone help me interpret this Tweet?

I don't speak idiot.