Chocolate Lab
Mere Commoner
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2014
- Messages
- 20,496
Geng will low-key allow it.
There is something wrong with you.
Oh, okay. You have redeemed yourself.I don't use it, to be clear. But I feel like grammatically it's fine. It's just typical slang that was clever when the first person used it, but is unoriginal and lazy when a million people use it.
Why do you have DE ahead of DT?Anyways, back on topic.
My preferred order by position:
OG
DE
RB
DT
TE
ILB
QB
I assume he just likes the DEs better. I don't think this is a needs list unless Booze lost his mind.Why do you have DE ahead of DT?
I have a feeling I know what his answer will be.Why do you have DE ahead of DT?
yeah, what he said.Why do you have DE ahead of DT?
Why do you have DE ahead of DT?
I have a feeling I know what his answer will be.
Because there are a limited number of them and I don’t think they should force it early.Why do you have DE ahead of DT?
It is still a greater need. And, to me, it's not close.Because there are a limited number of them and I don’t think they should force it early.
Of course it is a need. What you are basically telling me though is great, let’s bank on Mazi Smith because it is basically a one man show for what we appear to be looking for.It is still a greater need. And, to me, it's not close.
LOL, no, he's Anthony Miller to me until he isn't.Did Brandin Cooks die?
Why does the opinion on Schottenheimer’s kid seem to be elevated these days? To me, he is the same guy he has always been, definitely not top shelf.LOL, no, he's Anthony Miller to me until he isn't.
It's partly because Cooks is on his 4th team, partly that I'm unsure of Dak's chemistry with not only Cooks but maybe speed guys in general until it's proven, and partly because when was the last time we got lucky like that?
There's a knack for getting the most out of a speed WR, and it has a lot to do with timing and accuracy and also arm strength for when they break it really deep. Dak is not known for the first two, and is solid but not special on the last. He is more of a TE and big WR guy.
At least I have at least some confidence that Brian Schottenheimer knows what he's doing based on his success with Tyler Lockett
Who are those players teams will want to trade into the bottom of the first to get and insure a 5 year contract?Because there are a limited number of them and I don’t think they should force it early.
I was only talking about his ability to properly utilize a guy like Cooks.Why does the opinion on Schottenheimer’s kid seem to be elevated these days? To me, he is the same guy he has always been, definitely not top shelf.
He did great with Cole Beasley and Randall Cobb. We just don't usually use smaller receivers. Hell he even had some good moments with Hilton last year.I was only talking about his ability to properly utilize a guy like Cooks.
I think he'll be like a much better TY Hilton who plays all year. Dak did okay with him.LOL, no, he's Anthony Miller to me until he isn't.
It's partly because Cooks is on his 4th team, partly that I'm unsure of Dak's chemistry with not only Cooks but maybe speed guys in general until it's proven, and partly because when was the last time we got lucky like that?
There's a knack for getting the most out of a speed WR, and it has a lot to do with timing and accuracy and also arm strength for when they break it really deep. Dak is not known for the first two, and is solid but not special on the last. He is more of a TE and big WR guy.
At least I have at least some confidence that Brian Schottenheimer knows what he's doing based on his success with Tyler Lockett
Good call re: Cobb. Beasley I think is very different and ran very short patterns when he was here, but Cobb might be just the right comparison with Cooks being about the same age (as Cobb when he was here) though faster.He did great with Cole Beasley and Randall Cobb. We just don't usually use smaller receivers. Hell he even had some good moments with Hilton last year.