Simpleton
DCC 4Life
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2013
- Messages
- 20,821
That play is one of the reasons why I don't feel bad at all about the questionable "sack" they gave Parsons. That contact by Samuel was more egregious than the one they called on Kearse to take away an INT.Not only is it not PI, but even if there was some contact, referees have generally allowed more leeway in regards to aggressive contact if the defender makes a play on the ball and gets a pick.
That was a brutally bad call and I think if the interception stands, we win that game by 10 points.
So they basically gave the Chargers an extra drive if they call both those plays the same. Either both are calls or both are non-calls, either way we lose a possession while the Chargers gain one since both went in their favor.
Plus, even if the Parsons play wasn't a "sack", it should've been intentional grounding since the ball didn't even get back to the LOS. Whether or not it was a sack is irrelevant, one way or the other the Chargers should've ran their next play from where Herbert threw it.