- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 120,562
Problem is you can only get 1 first down per catch.The other guy averages 2 first downs with a catch...
Problem is you can only get 1 first down per catch.The other guy averages 2 first downs with a catch...
Ok, so it eliminates the need for the second first down... You're a shit stirrer sirProblem is you can only get 1 first down per catch.
You're a shit stirrer sir
I'd go Cooper over Elliott, he only has 2-3 years left whereas Cooper could easily play another 5-6 years at a high level.
Prescott
Lamb
Martin
Collins
Gallup
Elliott
T. Smith
Lawrence
Diggs
Gregory
Uh...that is all I got
I would be very tempted for one of the defensive keepers to be Gregory.I'd go Cooper over Elliott, he only has a few years left.
Defensively I'd go Brown, LVE, Wilson, Lewis and Neal on top of those three.
Really sad state of affairs on defense, we desperately need to get at least two high level starters out of this rookie class.
Nobody's gonna draft him away from you though.I would be very tempted for one of the defensive keepers to be Gregory.
Yea those 5 plus Lawrence/Diggs/Gregory as booze said.I would be very tempted for one of the defensive keepers to be Gregory.
Oh, I didn't see that Booze said Gregory.Yea those 5 plus Lawrence/Diggs/Gregory as booze said.
On second thought I'd actually keep Gallimore over Lewis.
I would too. Young promising DT is kind of important for us.Yea those 5 plus Lawrence/Diggs/Gregory as booze said.
On second thought I'd actually keep Gallimore over Lewis.
Wait...we have that?I would too. Young promising DT is kind of important for us.
Low probability of being an elite level player but I'd rather gamble on that than a known "solid" player like Lewis. And I think Gallimore is mostly assured to be at least a Lewis-level player in which case I'd rather have a Lewis-level DT than CB.Wait...we have that?
The other guy averages 2 first downs with a catch...
I'm not sure why you'd prefer at least two passes to accomplish what you can in one. All you did was double your risk of a sack, fumble, INT or something else bad happening.
Ok, so it eliminates the need for the second first down...
Really? Not looking at Targets (ie Catch %), you’re comparing 60 vs 107 receptions. Imagine having a #1 WR that averages less than 4 catches a game. In a four-game stretch, that’s 4 + 4 + 4 + 3 receptions.
You don't need the second first down if you get 20 yards instead of 10...You can only get 1 first down at a time.
Obviously more yards are better than less yards. But you seem to be discounting the fact that more catches are better than less catches.
Yeah, but you still have to get another first down, and 100 to 60 with the one with 100 having a > 10 YPC gives you better odds that the 100 catch receiver can get you that next first down.You don't need the second first down if you get 20 yards instead of 10...