- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 120,370
Looks like the board may need to be purged.Had 600 posts at gametime last Sunday Night game we played.
Looks like the board may need to be purged.Had 600 posts at gametime last Sunday Night game we played.
Or we can revisit whether Edelman is a pathetic receiver.or we could just ask Ravi about Beasley
Somebody said Edelman was a pathetic receiver? I must have missed that.Or we can revisit whether Edelman is a pathetic receiver.
Not really. He's sucked out loud all preseason.Surprising about Odighizuwa.
His stats are pathetic, so he must be pretty damn close to pathetic.Somebody said Edelman was a pathetic receiver? I must have missed that.
About time someone said it.Or we can revisit whether Edelman is a pathetic receiver.
So nobody said he was a pathetic WR then?His stats are pathetic, so he must be pretty damn close to pathetic.
In what other instance can you say a player's stats are pathetic and the actual player still be considered really good?So nobody said he was a pathetic WR then?
And 10yds per catch is pretty sorry for a WR.
Doesn't mean he's pathetic as a receiver tho. But since nobody ever said that...
What?Uhh Guys?
Pretty much. Yards per catch isn't the only statistic that matters. It's why he could have a pathetic 10 yards per catch but still not be a pathetic WR. Other things matter too like catch rates, total yards...So nobody said he was a pathetic WR then?
And 10yds per catch is pretty sorry for a WR.
Doesn't mean he's pathetic as a receiver tho. But since nobody ever said that...
Murray's 6 fumbles last year were pathetic, but he had an awesome season. See how that works? Pretty fancy, I know.In what other instance can you say a player's stats are pathetic and the actual player still be considered really good?
It's a stupid notion.