Search results

Yea but Gary is also a Pro Bowler, if it was a worse team I wouldn't need as many picks if we were also getting a youngish Pro Bowler.

If the Packers want to send us Rashan Gary, two 1's and two 2's, I'd do that for sure.

I wouldn't trade Tolbert for a 6, he's still really good depth for a year and a 6 is whatever. A 4 or maybe a 5, or a productive player on an expiring deal like Breece Hall? Sure.

Sure, but that's also dumber than just extending him now because if they do it now they have an extra year (this year) to spread money out across. Next year it's just a straight 4 year deal at whatever he signs at.

If we franchise him I think the price is just two 1's, which I'm sure we'd get, but it's likely less than we would get if we just dealt him right now. So just another example of their idiocy and inability to navigate how the league works.

I think Jerry wanted heavy incentives, which I'm guessing are somewhat in Schotty's contract. It's all a bit of a farce.

This is where I'm at, wake me up if he's not signed by kickoff against the Eagles. It's still fun coming up with trade scenarios in the meantime though.

Told you guys this last night, he needs to get stronger but he could have real long-term potential to get Steele off the roster finally.

True, could also be additional posturing from Parsons and his camp given that the general assumption is that this will all work itself out.

If Jerry does the same old shit that he always does and signs Parsons in about a week's time, Schefter is going in the clickbait category, barely much better than a guy like Fisher after the alarmist shit he's been throwing out every other day.

They were also a clear top 3-5 team in the country with Ewers, they nearly made the championship in 2023 and did again last year as well. I'm guessing they just thought it was too risky to change course that dramatically in the middle of a season where they were already ranked 4th or whatever...

His name is the majority of it but I also think he's quite talented, although the perception would be way different if his last name was Jackson. I also think most Texas fans felt Manning was better (@Texas Ace) but I think they were just banking on experience and the fact that they were top...

He'd have to have a Burrow-like season back in 2020 or whatever for me to consider him at that level. Burrow put up 60 fucking TD's to 6 INT's at 76% completion. He had Jefferson and Chase of course, but those are ungodly numbers.

I don't think there are any "generational" QB's coming out in the next year or two, maybe Manning but probably not. The last QB I thought was truly generational was Luck, Burrow and Lawrence were close but not quite there for me. But there are going to be some legitimate generational position...

Yea we definitely need guys with size who can set the edge, so I wouldn't complain. Kneeland is about the only edge right now who isn't some light in the ass 245 lb.'er.

They did go all in though.

Wheat behind Kneeland and Hall as the lead nickel CB jumped out as interesting. Childress seems to have outplayed Hall to me, although either way it's probably going to be something of a disaster if either of them are our 3rd CB for more than like two weeks. Richards being buried on the depth...

Maybe they'll get it right with their upcoming 2026 top 5 pick.

I said yesterday they need to either shit (extend him) or get off the pot (trade him for a haul). But knowing them they'll probably do the dumbest thing possible and string it out, potentially forcing him to play, franchising him, etc.

Watching the end of the Ravens game again and Cornelius really does look good, way quicker feet than I expected. He's probably not as good as a vet like Adeniji just yet, but I think you have to keep him on the 53 with the idea of possibly replacing Steele in a year or two.