Random Politics Stuff Thread...

Chocolate Lab

Mere Commoner
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Messages
20,323
What about the same in far right ideology?

Today’s MAGA (R) is not like the Bushes nor Reagan. It is just as extreme and insane.
What besides possibly abortion is so objectionable?

You aren't buying the garbage about Nazis or any of that nonsense, are you?
 

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
123,109
What besides possibly abortion is so objectionable?

You aren't buying the garbage about Nazis or any of that nonsense, are you?
Well think about the man giving birth thing you just talked about. It used to be nonsense as well.
 

Chocolate Lab

Mere Commoner
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Messages
20,323
Well think about the man giving birth thing you just talked about. It used to be nonsense as well.
Huh?

I meant what is the equivalent from the right that you were referring to.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,281
Well think about the man giving birth thing you just talked about. It used to be nonsense as well.
Like I said, the center line has moved.
 

Irving Cowboy

DCC 4Life
Joined
Feb 7, 2014
Messages
1,689
Pretty interesting take on what has infected my Republican Party over the past 8 years:

One presentation of the rise of Donald Trump focuses on the anti-establishment backlash that the Republican Party experienced during the presidency of Barack Obama. The tea party was one manifestation, and Trump’s appearance as a presidential candidate in 2015 did attempt to leverage that frustration with establishment Washington.

More important, though, was the overlap between that anti-establishment sentiment and the embrace of outright false claims about political subjects. Part of the frustration with Republican leaders was that their actions and rhetoric were increasingly divergent from the rhetoric on Fox News and on fringier upstarts like Breitbart. Trump was both unattached to D.C. respectability and immersed in the fringe-right vernacular, and that’s what he presented to Republican primary voters.

This was the origin of the idea that Trump speaks frankly while others don’t. It wasn’t that he was honest; far from it. It was that he said the things that his supporters were hearing from (dishonest) actors elsewhere because he didn’t care about being seen as dishonest. His supporters saw this as unusual honesty, when it was in fact the opposite.

Trump’s dishonesty has been relentless ever since, often infecting his allies and his party. But he retains a perception of honesty and frankness among his supporters because they dislike and distrust those pointing out his dishonesty — his opponents, the media, etc. Trump is granted the benefit of the doubt, despite being perhaps uniquely undeserving of it.
 

Chocolate Lab

Mere Commoner
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Messages
20,323
No offense my man, but that wasn't interesting at all. It was just more "Orange Man Bad."

Where was that from? Wherever it was, it's just more establishment uniparty propaganda.

I hate to tell them, but most people in this country aren't for their unending wars, trillion-dollar deficits, sexualizing kids. racial division, open borders, and increasing government interference in their lives. That isn't Trump lying about the "virtuous" other side, that's just a fact.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,281
No offense my man, but that wasn't interesting at all. It was just more "Orange Man Bad."

Where was that from? Wherever it was, it's just more establishment uniparty propaganda.

I hate to tell them, but most people in this country aren't for their unending wars, trillion-dollar deficits, sexualizing kids. racial division, open borders, and increasing government interference in their lives. That isn't Trump lying about the "virtuous" other side, that's just a fact.
Big facts. And anyone that tries to deny it are delusional
 

Cujo

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
3,737
I love the dude in the red tie. He is 100% correct. :towel

Patrick Bet-David. One of the most interesting channels I've found on Youtube in the last year. He was born in Iran and raised in the U.S. He's a conservative but frequently has guests with opposing views and it usually remains pretty civil.
 

Chocolate Lab

Mere Commoner
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Messages
20,323
Don't forget at 1:37 he says Jan 6 "was more severe than the attack on Pearl Harbor." :doh

What an incredible piece of shit Steve Schmidt is.
 

Smitty

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
22,580
Pretty interesting take on what has infected my Republican Party over the past 8 years:

One presentation of the rise of Donald Trump focuses on the anti-establishment backlash that the Republican Party experienced during the presidency of Barack Obama. The tea party was one manifestation, and Trump’s appearance as a presidential candidate in 2015 did attempt to leverage that frustration with establishment Washington.

More important, though, was the overlap between that anti-establishment sentiment and the embrace of outright false claims about political subjects. Part of the frustration with Republican leaders was that their actions and rhetoric were increasingly divergent from the rhetoric on Fox News and on fringier upstarts like Breitbart. Trump was both unattached to D.C. respectability and immersed in the fringe-right vernacular, and that’s what he presented to Republican primary voters.

This was the origin of the idea that Trump speaks frankly while others don’t. It wasn’t that he was honest; far from it. It was that he said the things that his supporters were hearing from (dishonest) actors elsewhere because he didn’t care about being seen as dishonest. His supporters saw this as unusual honesty, when it was in fact the opposite.

Trump’s dishonesty has been relentless ever since, often infecting his allies and his party. But he retains a perception of honesty and frankness among his supporters because they dislike and distrust those pointing out his dishonesty — his opponents, the media, etc. Trump is granted the benefit of the doubt, despite being perhaps uniquely undeserving of it.
The problem with this "take," is that it one-sidedly ignores the "embrace of outright false claims," from the establishment while blaming the anti-establishment for such an embrace.

Which is why your - and everyone else's - slandering of Trump is worthless nonsense.

People don't like Trump. They just pick him because they know they are getting a level of bullshit either way. His lies aren't being "excused." It's everyone else's lies that are being rejected.

"His supporters dislike and distrust those pointing out his dishonesty." No shit?? Maybe because they are hypocrites and worse liars than he is? There isn't a mainstream news organization or journalism outfit that tells the truth, period.

Remember how they said he wasn't telling the truth about Covid? Whoops.
 
Top Bottom