This is all just setting up another reason to fire up the 'ol outrage/riots machine.
Especially with the new FBI footage that has come out.This is all just setting up another reason to fire up the 'ol outrage/riots machine.
Hell, anybody that wasn't legally blind and had half a brain (and didn't have an agenda to follow) that saw the footage could see this was clearly self defense.
Just like the Trayvon Martin thing, except in that case, what the left wanted to be illegal was that someone got shot after mean old George Zimmerman decided to profile someone. There entire case hinged on "Zimmerman was in the wrong for profiling, so when Martin jumped him and got shot, it's Zimmerman's fault for profiling him."I remember watching this whole Rittenhouse thing unfold in real time while watching rioting streams.
I never thought he’d even go to trial. He was 100% in the right. He decided to defend himself.
Sounds very familiar to some big events that happened in the 1940s.Just like the Trayvon Martin thing, except in that case, what the left wanted to be illegal was that someone got shot after mean old George Zimmerman decided to profile someone. There entire case hinged on "Zimmerman was in the wrong for profiling, so when Martin jumped him and got shot, it's Zimmerman's fault for profiling him."
Now with the Rittenhouse case, they want him in jail because he brought a gun to fight back against dangerous criminals who were breaking the law while "protesting," and the left doesn't want those people to have to fear for their lives while they commit crimes. Therefore they believe Rittenhouse should be punished for violation of their culture code, not cause he actually committed murder.
Just like Zimmerman, in the Rittenhouse case the left wants him punished because someone died misbehaving while Rittenhouse was pushing back on their misbehavior, but the left thinks it's flock should be free from consequence. It can attack whoever it wants if it's doing it in the name of stopping conservative politics and you aren't allowed to fight back or you are arrested and put on trial for murder.
It’s pretty troubling the way the media has these panels with obvious leftists that just blatantly disregard facts while trying to shape public perception of what actually happened.Just like the Trayvon Martin thing, except in that case, what the left wanted to be illegal was that someone got shot after mean old George Zimmerman decided to profile someone. There entire case hinged on "Zimmerman was in the wrong for profiling, so when Martin jumped him and got shot, it's Zimmerman's fault for profiling him."
Now with the Rittenhouse case, they want him in jail because he brought a gun to fight back against dangerous criminals who were breaking the law while "protesting," and the left doesn't want those people to have to fear for their lives while they commit crimes. Therefore they believe Rittenhouse should be punished for violation of their culture code, not cause he actually committed murder.
Just like Zimmerman, in the Rittenhouse case the left wants him punished because someone died misbehaving while Rittenhouse was pushing back on their misbehavior, but the left thinks it's flock should be free from consequence. It can attack whoever it wants if it's doing it in the name of stopping conservative politics and you aren't allowed to fight back or you are arrested and put on trial for murder.
It's like they want the felony murder rule to be applied to actions that aren't felonies. The felony murder rule is that if someone is killed while you are committing a felony, you are guilty of the murder whether you were trying to make the kill or not. Ie, if you are robbing a bank, you tie people up, put them in a room and lock them in while you rob the bank, and then completely unrelated the ceiling collapses in that room and kills them, you are guilty of murder.
The left wants this concept to apply to it's social justice policies. You instigate a profiling and someone dies as a result (even if they attacked you), they want you guilty of murder. You bring a legal rifle to a protest and someone attacks you and gets killed, you are guilty of murder. Why? Shouldn't have had the gun there, you evil conservative. How dare you exercise your constitutional rights?
It's very risky. Especially since they seemed to have the trial already in hand.He took the stand? I've watched a lot of Perry Mason, and that's almost unheard of.
Yeah I accidentally switch my XM station to the POTUS station in my car and they were doing exactly that. Basically claiming that the judge wasn't acting impartial.Of course Twitter's main take away isn't that the Prosecution is committing consitutional violations but instead "This judge is biased! durrr"
That's how you know Twitter didn't go to law school and has never practiced law.
I mean I'm not sure why that would be. I mean he is just opening himself up for an easy appeal if he got the conviction.
When the Judge explained about the rounds, the DA goes "Well judge you are kind of testifying," or something like that and the Judge retorts back to the DA "Well you've been testifying the whole time," lol.
Binger should be held in contempt.When the Judge explained about the rounds, the DA goes "Well judge you are kind of testifying," or something like that and the Judge retorts back to the DA "Well you've been testifying the whole time," lol.