So who is going to pay the rent? Or would the owners of the structure just be banned from collecting it?$2K per month and they're not obligated to spend any of it on rent? the Dem party has become a Ponzi scheme.
View attachment 690504
These people have zero knowledge of basic ass economics.$2K per month and they're not obligated to spend any of it on rent? the Dem party has become a Ponzi scheme.
View attachment 690504
You know how many mortgage/real estate companies would fold? And how many people that work for those companies would lose their jobs? These people are retarded.So who is going to pay the rent? Or would the owners of the structure just be banned from collecting it?
Idiots!$2K per month and they're not obligated to spend any of it on rent? the Dem party has become a Ponzi scheme.
View attachment 690504
Disgusting ass people.
That is always where it lands. And the end result for this specific scenario is the lender is the one who takes the loss which is a crazy irony because without the lender nothing would be beneficial to the landlord or tennent. They both would benefit but the underwriter would suffer.so the renter owes nothing to the landlord and the landlord owes nothing to the lender, which leaves the lender ...
If this were only true. Did they have a statement as to how the virus does its thing.Just so no one forgets...